If it’s mostly men. Who the hell are they having an affair with?My dad used to say, it’s always the women that cause the problems. He didn’t mean having affairs, which is mostly men who do that, he was talking about exactly what’s happening here. I’ve seen it myself in my own family and other families.
Pete, if Meg and the colour of her baby was discussed, why won't she say who it was?Dave, perhaps he now wishes he hadn't any royal blood?
With the exception of the Queen herself, most of the others haven't set a brilliant example in terms of behavior and good leadership have they? Not helped, mind you, by the Palace machinery around them which has also been shown to be sadly lacking. I still remember the story about the dodgy butler to Charles, whose duties included putting the toothpaste on his toothbrush, even when he was an adult. Is it any wonder they are a dysfunctional family, out of touch and often arrogant.
If you buy the right steak English mustard and a glass of red.
There is a tweet going around saying that one of the things that Johnson objected to was the Cummings team referring to Carrie Symonds as 'Princess nut nuts'.
Glad to see that the government is looking at the bigger picture and focussing on the public health crisis and Brexit deal problems that we are facing.
Can seasideone confirm if this is true?
Horses for courses, it is a squad game now.
Yes, I saw the reaction of a nurse on the news. It’s quite a historic moment to be honest and thanks to your wife and all those helping to deliver the vaccine. Marvellous work they are doing
No point him staying there when there has been no decision yet if their season will resume or not. Better to have him back at Blackpool.
DH was pushing for the season to be declared null and void to avoid relegation. Funny how he's had a 180 degree turn around.
Totally open minded about who's telling the truth, maybe there are two truths. The RF certainly has history, the fact that Andrew is still skulking does them no favours, HM got Diana's death appallingly wrong, and Charles is a few sandwiches short of a picnic.
Oprah was totally behind the Sussexes agenda, I have read how she is a great interviewer, kind but probing. A real interviewer would have asked Harry, when he said he had been financially cut off, whether he believed he should be paid for a job he wasn't doing, or should use his own Fortune. Meghan should have been asked why she was so estranged from her father and sister.
The only Royal they have directly trashed so far is Duchess of Cambridge, calling her a liar. I can make any allegation I like, but if I cannot back up with a who, it is meaningless. Racism is an easy card to play, it may well be true, but back it up.
Then we have Penny Junor's take, who is so up the RF arse that she felt Diana shouldn't have complained about Charles having a BJ from Camilla the day before his wedding
Haven't got a Scooby, but think it damages both sides.
Maybe she should have asked how, given her aversion to racism she ended up married to Harry who is not averse to a bit of racism himself. Remember ”my little Paki friend” comment. And not forgetting his nazi costume at a natives and colonials fancy dress partyOprah was totally behind the Sussexes agenda, I have read how she is a great interviewer, kind but probing. A real interviewer would have asked Harry, when he said he had been financially cut off, whether he believed he should be paid for a job he wasn't doing, or should use his own Fortune. Meghan should have been asked why she was so estranged from her father and sister.
Oprah Winfrey has also said that Harry said it wasn't the Queen or PhillipThe ITV correspondent says he's been told categorically it wasn't the Queen or Prince Phillip - which suggests there maybe something in it
I get the impression from what I have seen is that they are inferring it's someone very close so that would suggest Charles or William
It was apparently Harry that said the remarks had been said to him, not to Meghan. He has apparently also said that it wasn't the Queen or Phillip.Pete, if Meg and the colour of her baby was discussed, why won't she say who it was?
Or was it just tittle tattle between minor staff workers?
She goes on the biggest talk show in the US and makes half statements. Why not come out and say who it was?
There’s another run chase coming on now you’ve done that Archie, because the establishment might be stumped, they might be caught out, or they might just bowl a googly.I thank you. I have had to prod it along at times. But with Megs bringing on the spin bowler in the early hours, the run rate has accelerated.
So he should, it’s a private family matter and should have been kept so.Yep. That is indisputable. And probably what they intended. Though Harry sounded a little plaintive over his father’s reaction. I find it all a very strange mixture of sad, amusing, deplorable and silly at the same time. Just typical family feud stuff, but with added fame.
But Bozo has gone and hidden in his fridge again!
Sarah Vine is Michael Gove’s wife as well as a Daily Heil opinion writer. At times, she is the Shitstirrer Extraordinaire on his behalf (sources close to... etc). I am not saying this is the case with Haz and Megs, but there are certain elements of the Conservative Party who may have had to bite their tongues during the fairytale wedding of three years ago. However, now they are back.I don't know who Sara Vine is but she obviously knew what she was talking about.
I like Sarah Vine.Sarah Vine is Michael Gove’s wife as well as a Daily Heil opinion writer. At times, she is the Shitstirrer Extraordinaire on his behalf (sources close to... etc). I am not saying this is the case with Haz and Megs, but there are certain elements of the Conservative Party who may have had to bite their tongues during the fairytale wedding of three years ago. However, now they are back.
Because she is clearly shit stirrer in chief .One thing I find strange, why was she interviewed first and then he joined later?
This is not unprecedented. I recall that Diana was so poorly treated by Charles and the Palace machine in the early years of her marriage that she threw herself down the stairs in Buck House in a suicide attempt or a bid to gain some attention. They must have been fairly high and wide stairs considering it’s Buck House. About 1984 or 85?Trouble is, whatever your opinions, we have only heard one side so cannot possibly take it for granted that theirs it is a true version of events.
Meghan saying she was suicidal?
Was this an effort to gain public sympathy or was she genuinely that low?
Because Oprah likes very personal one-on-one cosy interviews to gently bring the subject out of her shell. Also, it was presented as a powerful women session. If Harry had been there, the questions would have been shared and the personal impact lessened.One thing I find strange, why was she interviewed first and then he joined later?
You lack intelligence on every post you make. Just pulling you up on your massive level of stupidity.You obviously didn’t understand my reply, no need for such aggression in your reply, what’s your problem, another unnecessary angry poster. Or are you just thick.
He does come across as very angry this kurtis fella , obviously being locked up in a yellow submarine has got to himYou obviously didn’t understand my reply, no need for such aggression in your reply, what’s your problem, another unnecessary angry poster. Or are you just thick.
Kate is bigger golddigger she's still on the gravy train paid for by us.I said from day one she would cause trouble, and not because of the colour of her skin but because she is a Yankee golddigger. Not happy to be proved correct, I liked Harry, even with all his faults.