Now I come to think of it, I've never correlated the two, how strange. Groups of grooming gangs tried and convicted.....what the fook has that got to do with anything!
When were Asian grooming gang discussions banned? I must have missed that one.
That she's donating to charity and is her only course of action now the accusations are time barred.
Hold on.Charity
Like the $2m mansion she's just bought from selling her story.
They were never banned and are a regular topic of conversation, that typically results in concensus that the acts are abhorrent and the perpetrators deserve lengthy prison sentences.
imagine the amount of people he is introduced to and has been photographed with must be thousands and could anybody be expected to remember them all I dont think so too
True. But the photo wasn’t a “meet and greet with Mr or Mrs Anonymous for 10 seconds at a public event” sort. It looks to have been in a private flat and suggests a certain closeness between the two.
I would probably have phrased it differently but can understand why you might have reached that conclusion.
So are you saying ex Hooker Drug addicts aren't entitled to call out the abuse that put them on that track ? (not having a clue whether any of your allegations are true)
Good point. Slippery slope is that.
You're missing the nuances of the posts, either deliberately or not.
The only word at issue here is the word "Asian". And as you, Curryman and one or two others talk about them to the exclusion of all other such gangs you can see the problem.
No, we are not. There is now going to be a civil court case so PA has every opportunity to go over to New York and present his side of the story for a full and fair hearing. Unless he settles out of court, of course, without admitting liability but covering his reputation in shite.
I do beg your pardon, you are quite right. You introduced grooming gangs and said we weren't allowed to talk about them. And then promptly did. Like others, I assumed you meant Asian gangs because...... hang on, haven't we done this already?
That’s the “Court of Public Opinion” for you, whether fair or not. It will inevitably reach its own judgement in the absence of a real trial.
That’s just not true. The Home Office has found otherwise, that most sexual grooming offences are committed by white males under 30. It’s just that there have been several recent high-profile cases involving Asian gangs.
www.theguardian.com
What was this 2020?
That’s just not true. The Home Office has found otherwise, that most sexual grooming offences are committed by white males under 30. It’s just that there have been several recent high-profile cases involving Asian gangs.
I guess you would have to explain your use of the word “disproportionately”. But let’s not discriminate, all nonces are criminally evil.
Most child sexual abuse gangs made up of white men, Home Office report says
Study of England, Scotland and Wales dispels myth of ‘Asian grooming gangs’ popularised by far right
Every discussion point be it weather, holidays, work etc should commence with a brief conversation highlighting Asian grooming gangs then you can move onto the topic of your choice.
What does seem to be true is that Asian Males of Pakistani origin are overwhelmingly over-represented (pretty much to the exclusion of everyone else) in regard to a very specific type of sexual grooming crime. The fact that this particular crime appears (at least on the face of it) to have rather different motivation than certain other child sexual abuse makes it unique or unusual...
That’s just not true. The Home Office has found otherwise, that most sexual grooming offences are committed by white males under 30. It’s just that there have been several recent high-profile cases involving Asian gangs.
I guess you would have to explain your use of the word “disproportionately”. But let’s not discriminate, all nonces are criminally evil.
Most child sexual abuse gangs made up of white men, Home Office report says
Study of England, Scotland and Wales dispels myth of ‘Asian grooming gangs’ popularised by far right
Quite surprised we haven’t had a storming reposte from 20’s saying he breeds Daschunds and not sausage dogs, as specifically mentioned in the post.
Daschunds!! That's the word I was looking for.
I was under the impression that I was Coppiceman
Isn’t he now claiming some form of Crown Immunity or Sovereign Immunity because he was “working” as a Royal Family member at the time of the - allegedPrince Andrew now has the choice of whether to enter that courtroom to prove his innocence... or not.
This seems to sum up his position quite well.
Of course Prince Andrew isn’t sweating over this lawsuit – he can’t | Marina Hyde
The Duke of York is the subject of a US civil suit brought by Virginia Giuffre, who alleges she was abused while a minor, says Guardian columnist Marina Hyde
- abuse?
No, I'm coppiceman, or is it Spartacus? I forget.
Indeed. The previous post was a belter...
I think every fact in this single sentence is wrong, good going.
You're entitled to your opinion too - it's called social media.
Yes, but there's also fact.
I’m sorry, but your opinion shows no understanding of the crime of Child Sexual Exploitation, and suggests you think the girl is the guilty party instead of the men who had sex with a minor, just because they rewarded her for letting them.
