Well I think he began by denying ever having met her but then there were photos.I personally don’t like the guy but the majority on here have him hung drawn and quartered. At the moment it’s his word against hers.
Happy to be corrected but is there any proof of wrongdoing.
Yep. The AVFTT kangaroo court in full swingI personally don’t like the guy but the majority on here have him hung drawn and quartered. At the moment it’s his word against hers.
Happy to be corrected but is there any proof of wrongdoing.
The poor victim. She's so distraught, so traumatised, so exploited...
that she's asking for a huge financial settlement to make all the pain go away.
Torygoebbels and now victim shamer. You branching out Joe?The poor victim. She's so distraught, so traumatised, so exploited...
that she's asking for a huge financial settlement to make all the pain go away.
Rusty, he hung around with nonces, then lied about the relationship with the nonces and young girls proved to be exploited by the nonces have accused him of being a nonce.Yep. The AVFTT kangaroo court in full swing
He won't be tried though, he's protected by those above the law.A nonce he may be, but he should still be tried via the correct judicial way. Innocent until proven guilty isn't it.
The poor victim. She's so distraught, so traumatised, so exploited...
that she's asking for a huge financial settlement to make all the pain go away.
Really dumb comment. She’s pursuing the available legal action against somebody who raped her as a child sex slave. Should victims of abuse donate all court proceeds to charity just to protect the fragile ego of men such as yourself? Or do we think maybe, just maybe, when you’re trafficked as a sex slave and literally raped by royalty you might be in line for some kind of compensation??
Know your place.The people who are defending him are the same people who have a kangaroo court mentality for crimes committed by the lower plebs.
Can't say I'm a fan of Andrew. He's clearly lying about not knowing her, but if you read the other side of the story you might form a different opinion. For example, her incessant lying, her regular unfounded claims of sexual abuse and her previous false accusations of rape which were not pursued by the police due to lack of credibility. Plenty of evidence online. Try TNO's attachment at #21 for a taster. I don't really give a shit whether Andy is charged or not, but only a mug would believe her stories.
If your idea of evidence is unsourced character assassinations like that in post #21 then I feel sorry for you.
Because the media have a real downer on those in positions of power...Don't feel sorry for me mate. Just open your mind a little and stop believing all you read in the media.
Because the media have a real downer on those in positions of power...
Not always. You also know that things are kept out of the news when it suits. Depends on the agenda.Cmon Wiz, you know that the English tabloids are like a pack of rabid dogs when it comes to attacking the rich and powerful.
No it doesn't and you're correct Lytham, it doesn't look good. I'm not sticking up for him and I'm not a fan of him, far from it.Rusty, he hung around with nonces, then lied about the relationship with the nonces and young girls proved to be exploited by the nonces have accused him of being a nonce.
It doesn't look great does it?
Cmon Wiz, you know that the English tabloids are like a pack of rabid dogs when it comes to attacking the rich and powerful.
Fair enough. I don't expect the case will be going any further so maybe we'll never know the truth.The fact that mainstream media has an agenda does not preclude the fact that unsourced character assassinations are still likely to be bullshit. The fact that I don’t take random unsourced bullshit as evidence does not preclude my being open minded.
And he said he couldn’t sweat ...Rusty, he hung around with nonces, then lied about the relationship with the nonces and young girls proved to be exploited by the nonces have accused him of being a nonce.
It doesn't look great does it?
No it doesn't and you're correct Lytham, it doesn't look good. I'm not sticking up for him and I'm not a fan of him, far from it.
He's behaved despicably in my opinion.
I'd just rather see somebody tried in a courtroom and proved guilty beyond reasonable doubt. Rather that than being tried on social media.
And that's not good enough goose?At the moment it’s his word against hers
Well she can't unhave sex with him so assuming he is found guilty and as this is a civil case can't be imprisoned or fined, how should she be compensated?The poor victim. She's so distraught, so traumatised, so exploited...
that she's asking for a huge financial settlement to make all the pain go away.
The people who are defending him are the same people who have a kangaroo court mentality for crimes committed by the lower plebs.
I think they are all bastards if that makes you happierTo be honest, I find it rather strange that those who appear to be willing to convict Andrew without a trial are the very same folk who don't think that the problem of grooming gangs should be discussed after such groups have been tried and convicted.
Nowt as queer as folk.
I think they are all bastards if that makes you happier
The point is he won’t be, so we have to jump to conclusionA nonce he may be, but he should still be tried via the correct judicial way. Innocent until proven guilty isn't it.
Hazi, exactly.The point is he won’t be, so we have to jump to conclusion