It takes a big man to admit they are wrong

Rake away at any of my old posts, if anyone says something on here it is fair game to bring it back if they were wrong. I don’t honestly get the problem.
 
BFC_BFC_BFC said:
It’s piss poor form and all a bit sad mate… No need for it.

Nobody was ‘wrong’, people were just expressing opinions at a moment in time.
Click to expand...
In which case then he's still wrong coz therefore critch can't be wrong and he said he was wrong, so if noones wrong then I'm not wrong either for thinking he was wrong, and me thinking hazi was right is still wrong because he thought seasider was wrong when really he was right because he can't be wrong, and what you're saying is actually that noone can be wrong when in which case then we are both right when you still said we were wrong so really then who is right and who is wrong because we can't all be right and we can't all be wrong because some of us said that the others were right and some of us said that some of them were wrong so they can't be right and wrong and really now tbh I just want to rightly or wrongly get to the bottom of this whole fiasco because at the end of the day what he said was wrong but noones actually wrong or maybe actually yet again the all mighty and benevolent omnipotent bfcx3 has come here to tell us rightly the right opinion and the only opinion to have on the matter so basically we should all just yet again follow our fearless leader and worship his shoes and feet and legs and eyes and always remember they knows best in any situation so remember if it's wrong or right then its probably wrong if it's not what bfcx3 said.
 
🙄 if only you would put the same amount of energy into getting yourself off the bottom of the prediction table 👍
 
SwannDangerous said:
In which case then he's still wrong coz therefore critch can't be wrong and he said he was wrong, so if noones wrong then I'm not wrong either for thinking he was wrong, and me thinking hazi was right is still wrong because he thought seasider was wrong when really he was right because he can't be wrong, and what you're saying is actually that noone can be wrong when in which case then we are both right when you still said we were wrong so really then who is right and who is wrong because we can't all be right and we can't all be wrong because some of us said that the others were right and some of us said that some of them were wrong so they can't be right and wrong and really now tbh I just want to rightly or wrongly get to the bottom of this whole fiasco because at the end of the day what he said was wrong but noones actually wrong or maybe actually yet again the all mighty and benevolent omnipotent bfcx3 has come here to tell us rightly the right opinion and the only opinion to have on the matter so basically we should all just yet again follow our fearless leader and worship his shoes and feet and legs and eyes and always remember they knows best in any situation so remember if it's wrong or right then its probably wrong if it's not what bfcx3 said.
Click to expand...
Oh, simple as that is it?
 
L’étranger said:
Some might describe someone agitating for a good man to be undeservedly removed from his job as ‘poor form’.
I’m sure the opening poster is big enough to take it on the chin and learn from his mistakes.
Click to expand...
That might be the case, but if so then it was ‘poor form’ a year ago and not today. Deal with it at the time and get over it.
 
BFC_BFC_BFC said:
That might be the case, but if so then it was ‘poor form’ a year ago and not today. Deal with it at the time and get over it.
Click to expand...
I agree with you in principle. We all have opinions.

But if all you do is post deliberately contrary opinions to get attention it's not surprising if some of that attention is a bit unwanted.
 
Is it bollocks poor form, it's a message board, not a gentleman's club. If you post on here then you should be able to take a bit of crap like we all have over the years, especially when you just keep banging the same biased drum until you're inevitably right at some point.
 
SwannDangerous said:
In which case then he's still wrong coz therefore critch can't be wrong and he said he was wrong, so if noones wrong then I'm not wrong either for thinking he was wrong, and me thinking hazi was right is still wrong because he thought seasider was wrong when really he was right because he can't be wrong, and what you're saying is actually that noone can be wrong when in which case then we are both right when you still said we were wrong so really then who is right and who is wrong because we can't all be right and we can't all be wrong because some of us said that the others were right and some of us said that some of them were wrong so they can't be right and wrong and really now tbh I just want to rightly or wrongly get to the bottom of this whole fiasco because at the end of the day what he said was wrong but noones actually wrong or maybe actually yet again the all mighty and benevolent omnipotent bfcx3 has come here to tell us rightly the right opinion and the only opinion to have on the matter so basically we should all just yet again follow our fearless leader and worship his shoes and feet and legs and eyes and always remember they knows best in any situation so remember if it's wrong or right then its probably wrong if it's not what bfcx3 said.
Click to expand...
That's easy for you to say
 
Phil_bfc deux said:
So come on Simon, Brett and Ben time to get rid of the tinker man coach Critchley

Big fanfare when he came in almost a year ago about fast exciting 'entertaining' football yet the reality is that Critchley's record is almost the same as Graysons, the football isn't much better either

I posted a thread a couple of days ago highlighting the support Critchley has had from the board and showed examples of our current squad and how strong it looks on paper with options all over the pitch

There really isn't any excuse as Critchley has been given all the tools necessary to build a good consistent team

The problem to me is the stubbornness and his reluctance to play 2 strikers week in week out, the stats show that we win more games than we lose when we play 2 upfront

Yesterday was awful for a number of reasons

Another new formation, that looked defensive on paper with 5 in midfield, it was all about accommodating the new Sunderland lad in a free role behind Yates. He did ok but nothing special considering he was given the freedom to make things happen. We have and have had several other players who could of played that role yet weren't given the chance. Both Kemp and Woodburn have been and gone without being allowed to play in that free role 10 slot that they prefer

Ipswich were bang out of form with several key players missing yet we were impotent

Credit to Critchley for the signing of big Marv he has really improved since the start of the season, but i suppose even a broken clock is right once

Maybe Critchley was brought in the develop players if so move him sideways and get a proper manager in the manage the 1st team

Get rid now to save our season, admit the experiment hasn't worked and kick on

Simon Sadler deserves better
Click to expand...
what a load of rubbish !!!
 
Lytham_fy8 said:
Is it bollocks poor form, it's a message board, not a gentleman's club. If you post on here then you should be able to take a bit of crap like we all have over the years, especially when you just keep banging the same biased drum until you're inevitably right at some point.
Click to expand...
Course it is… Bookmarking threads is sad as fuck…

Basically the ‘bookmarker’ only ever re-posts if the thread turns out to vindicate their own perspective… And if we all did it, the board would be cluttered up with shit.
 
Boris Johnson is marvellous, wonderful, has never done anything wrong in his time as PM, has never lied and was never at any Downing street parties...and if he was he didn't know about it.
There...that should keep this thread going a bit longer🙂
 
BFC_BFC_BFC said:
Course it is… Bookmarking threads is sad as fuck…

Basically the ‘bookmarker’ only ever re-posts if the thread turns out to vindicate their own perspective… And if we all did it, the board would be cluttered up with shit.
Click to expand...
I found this thread by accident when idly looking over people's reactions to Critch being appointed as I couldn't remember what I thought, saw the date and thought it was funny to put it on Phil's Thorniley thread, because it was a year to the day almost and it was another over the top pop at the manager with no actual reasoning, just like the current thread, Hazi then replied which bumped it up the board.

There's no conspiratorial bookmarking fella and the OP's opinion hasn't changed at all.
 
SwannDangerous said:
In which case then he's still wrong coz therefore critch can't be wrong and he said he was wrong, so if noones wrong then I'm not wrong either for thinking he was wrong, and me thinking hazi was right is still wrong because he thought seasider was wrong when really he was right because he can't be wrong, and what you're saying is actually that noone can be wrong when in which case then we are both right when you still said we were wrong so really then who is right and who is wrong because we can't all be right and we can't all be wrong because some of us said that the others were right and some of us said that some of them were wrong so they can't be right and wrong and really now tbh I just want to rightly or wrongly get to the bottom of this whole fiasco because at the end of the day what he said was wrong but noones actually wrong or maybe actually yet again the all mighty and benevolent omnipotent bfcx3 has come here to tell us rightly the right opinion and the only opinion to have on the matter so basically we should all just yet again follow our fearless leader and worship his shoes and feet and legs and eyes and always remember they knows best in any situation so remember if it's wrong or right then its probably wrong if it's not what bfcx3 said.
Click to expand...
Head is still spinning, 2 wrongs do not make a right do they?
 
Lytham_fy8 said:
I found this thread by accident when idly looking over people's reactions to Critch being appointed as I couldn't remember what I thought, saw the date and thought it was funny to put it on Phil's Thorniley thread, because it was a year to the day almost and it was another over the top pop at the manager with no actual reasoning, just like the current thread, Hazi then replied which bumped it up the board.

There's no conspiratorial bookmarking fella and the OP's opinion hasn't changed at all.
Click to expand...
So basically you’ve spent days going through old threads and diarising them in date order to repost and make fun of us all…
 
Wizaard said:
I've never bookmarked a thread. But there is a search facility.. 🤔
Click to expand...
Phil loves posting contentious posts, so think he will be secretly pleased it was resurrected so he can improve his reaction scores.
To be fair Critch was copping a bit of flak from other posters as well last year
 
How can anyone say sack critchley in my eyes He’s a legend . We get 10000 home fans on a good day where clubs lower than us get double even in league one so I think we’re punching above our wait I’ve watched pool since 1984 and seen some gash managers . I put critch up along side billy ayre in legend status .
 
Ha, didn't read any of it, just the headline, lad is on drugs or just an attention seeker in which case I'm helping him.
 
Really poor form dragging this up AGAIN.

I thought it was a suspension for dragging up old threads to try and humiliate another poster?
 
Sometimes right, sometimes wrong, always certain.

Crack on for fucks sake. There's only so much time in life and someone, somewhere on the internet will always piss you off with their opinion .
 
L’étranger said:
Some might describe someone agitating for a good man to be undeservedly removed from his job as ‘poor form’.
I’m sure the opening poster is big enough to take it on the chin and learn from his mistakes.
Click to expand...
Doubt it, sounds like one of those gobshite fans every club has, inpatient, think they know better, talking bollocks.
 
Macseasider said:
Really poor form dragging this up AGAIN.

I thought it was a suspension for dragging up old threads to try and humiliate another poster?
Click to expand...
I am certainly not doing this to humiliate anyone, I am also sure Phil has thicker skin than that. The continual anti Critch posts particularly after games we have lost deserved some balance I thought.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top