Michael Gove

Recidivist3

Well-known member
So, at first he’s ‘absolutely certain’ that there’s no risk to children or teachers and then he’s ‘confident’ but acknowledges that there will always be some risk

I’m glad he cleared that one up
 
I'm not fan of Gove and nor do I think that the Government have handled the whole situation particularly well, but I think anyone with half a brain can grasp the situation. All the information we have suggests that schools are safe, but Gove can no more guarantee that someone might die of Covid19 after attending school than he could from any other communicable disease or by any other means. As he pointed out, there's always a risk in everything you do... You step outside, you might get struck by lightning, you stay inside, you might get caught in a house fire....

If you want to point the finger at anyone then it ought to be at the idiot Marr for asking such a ridiculous and pointless question...."Can you guarantee...."

What the public needs to know is what the level of risk actually is and what are the measures being taken to minimise the risk.
 
The bloke’s a knob but what’s the solution? Keep kids away from school until there’s a vaccine ( if ever) and end up with a generation of thickos?
 
I'm not fan of Gove and nor do I think that the Government have handled the whole situation particularly well, but I think anyone with half a brain can grasp the situation. All the information we have suggests that schools are safe, but Gove can no more guarantee that someone might die of Covid19 after attending school than he could from any other communicable disease or by any other means. As he pointed out, there's always a risk in everything you do... You step outside, you might get struck by lightning, you stay inside, you might get caught in a house fire....

If you want to point the finger at anyone then it ought to be at the idiot Marr for asking such a ridiculous and pointless question...."Can you guarantee...."

What the public needs to know is what the level of risk actually is and what are the measures being taken to minimise the risk.

then why say he’s absolutely certain ... why not just say that he can’t be 100% sure that a child or a teacher won’t die as a result of. .... ahh, I see
 
Nothing is 100% guaranteed apart from death and tax.

Andrew Marr is a terrible interviewer who just looks angry and acts it most the time.

The problem with interviewers like that, is that people go on the show with ‘guard up’ so you never get anything.

The best interviewer for me by a mile is Sophie Ridge who gets them talking and picks up on the relevant points.

She is also very pleasing on the eye, but that’s got nothing to do with it 😉
 
Last edited:
there's always a risk in everything you do... You step outside, you might get struck by lightning, you stay inside, you might get caught in a house fire....
Yes but you can look out of your window and see the thunder storm or you can be in the house and smell the smoke and then you can decide to go out and risk the lightening or decide to stay in and chuck some buckets of water about or to leave the house (hopefully fire not started by lightening!) - not so many clear signs when the danger is microscopic but you know you can only catch it from other humans or things other humans touched recently - so whats the best policy? I think I’ll try and avoid other people as much as possible thank you very much!
 
The bloke’s a knob but what’s the solution? Keep kids away from school until there’s a vaccine ( if ever) and end up with a generation of thickos?
It's a similar if less serious situation with the football. Those players (mainly from relegation threatened teams) who want the season scrapped. Do they think that the virus will conveniently pack it's bags and go away so they can start next season safely?
And with schools, the virus is most likely still going to be around in September for the start of the new term, and more than likely we won't have a vaccine then either.
But I don't know what the answer is. There's many people with far more understanding than me of pandemics, and none of them have the answer either. It's a very difficult situation.
 
Yes but you can look out of your window and see the thunder storm or you can be in the house and smell the smoke and then you can decide to go out and risk the lightening or decide to stay in and chuck some buckets of water about or to leave the house (hopefully fire not started by lightening!) - not so many clear signs when the danger is microscopic but you know you can only catch it from other humans or things other humans touched recently - so whats the best policy? I think I’ll try and avoid other people as much as possible thank you very much!
Which is exactly what we are doing...

There’s plenty of evidence to show that

a) The risk of significant transmission between children in a normal school environment is minimal.

b) The risk of children or healthy adults, within a certain age bracket, dying from the virus is also minimal.

Our high risk population are aware of who they are and we can take measures to limit contact with those who are vulnerable.

We can take proportionate measures in schools to ensure the already low transmission rates are reduced further.

We are already phasing the opening of schools and have much greater testing capability in the event of any possible isolated outbreak.

And of course, you are free to isolate yourself indefinitely, should that be something you feel it is the right thing for you personally👍
 
Gove said 18,000 contact tracers had been signed up this morning.The question was asked last week how many were signed up and the answer was around 1500 so either they increased the pathetic wage they were offering or somebody is lying.
 
The bloke’s a knob but what’s the solution? Keep kids away from school until there’s a vaccine ( if ever) and end up with a generation of thickos?
Why thickos? My daughter has been doing 6 or 7 hours work a day set by the school which is then scanned, sent in and marked.
 
Which is exactly what we are doing...

There’s plenty of evidence to show that

a) The risk of significant transmission between children in a normal school environment is minimal.

b) The risk of children or healthy adults, within a certain age bracket, dying from the virus is also minimal.

Our high risk population are aware of who they are and we can take measures to limit contact with those who are vulnerable.

We can take proportionate measures in schools to ensure the already low transmission rates are reduced further.

We are already phasing the opening of schools and have much greater testing capability in the event of any possible isolated outbreak.

And of course, you are free to isolate yourself indefinitely, should that be something you feel it is the right thing for you personally👍
So testing is some kind of reassurance is it? You can have as many tests as you like - but if you contract the damn thing all the testing in the world isn’t going to make you better, and no guarantee that you will only get mild symptoms even if you are not in an “at risk” group - just seem to be a lot of people trumpeting that other people should be placing themselves at risk for “the general good of the economy” to me is all - and especially those people in a better position to avoid that selfsame risk themselves.
 
Why thickos? My daughter has been doing 6 or 7 hours work a day set by the school which is then scanned, sent in and marked.
Is every school doing it? Is every parent bothered? What about vulnerable kids who live in dysfunctional families and never get a decent hot meal? I posted earlier “ keeping your kids out of school is a middle class privilege “
 
Maybe it will get to the point that teachers are given an ultimatum- go back to work or resign? Before that point perhaps go onto furlough at the 80% / £2500 cap.
Ultimately like the private sector, we cannot pay wages forever waiting for this to go away and it might mean that only those prepared to take the risk or have already recovered continue in teaching.
 
My daughter teaches at school in Manchester where the children have SEN's and they travel from all areas of Manchester, many from dysfunctional and poor families. They have not been given any protective clothing or any access to testing kits and are not given any of the (merited) privileges of the NHS staff - & do not complain. The teaching staff have to physically touch the students, as they are used to physical contact (cuddles / comforting etc) and any change in routine will adversely affect them - social distancing is impossible. They also have to physically restrain and deal with them spitting, biting & throwing poo! The likes of Mr Gove appear to be oblivious to the challenges they face and is it correct that MP's & Lords have refused to return to their place of work & prefer to receive their huge salaries by logging into their computers at home?
 
Why thickos? My daughter has been doing 6 or 7 hours work a day set by the school which is then scanned, sent in and marked.
Because your daughter is very likely one of a limited number of kids who will actually be benefitting from that level of attention at home wiz.
So testing is some kind of reassurance is it? You can have as many tests as you like - but if you contract the damn thing all the testing in the world isn’t going to make you better, and no guarantee that you will only get mild symptoms even if you are not in an “at risk” group - just seem to be a lot of people trumpeting that other people should be placing themselves at risk for “the general good of the economy” to me is all - and especially those people in a better position to avoid that selfsame risk themselves.
Yes, of course testing is some kind of reassurance.

We know that the evidence suggests limited transmission from kids and that kids and healthy young adults are not at risk. So through testing we can quickly identify and transmission in schools and prevent any significant knock on transmission in the community and more importantly in the vulnerable.

And there is no guarantee you might not crash your car, have a heart attack due to a loud bang, die from food poisoning after eating a dodgy kebab or whatever.

So long as the risk to life is not unduly significant then we have no reason to be unduly concerned.

What’s your alternative?
 
[QUOTE="BFC_BFC_BFC, post: 73772, member: 189

So long as the risk to life is not unduly significant then we have no reason to be unduly concerned.

[/QUOTE]

So what number of dead children and teachers would you regard as significant, BFC
 
I'm not fan of Gove and nor do I think that the Government have handled the whole situation particularly well, but I think anyone with half a brain can grasp the situation. All the information we have suggests that schools are safe, but Gove can no more guarantee that someone might die of Covid19 after attending school than he could from any other communicable disease or by any other means. As he pointed out, there's always a risk in everything you do... You step outside, you might get struck by lightning, you stay inside, you might get caught in a house fire....

If you want to point the finger at anyone then it ought to be at the idiot Marr for asking such a ridiculous and pointless question...."Can you guarantee...."

What the public needs to know is what the level of risk actually is and what are the measures being taken to minimise the risk.
He shouldn't have fallen into Marr's trap and said they teachers would be safe, they aren't, but as you said, they never were before Covid-19.
 
He shouldn't have fallen into Marr's trap and said they teachers would be safe, they aren't, but as you said, they never were before Covid-19.
It just frustrates me, because it's the public who are the loser here... Marr get's his 'prey' and the headlines focus on the narrow agenda "Gove fails to guarantee safety in Schools".

We have the same problem with this 3 week old 'rising R rate', which every man and his dog is now jumping on to try and undermine Government Policy.

Maybe we need Government to make more detailed information available, I don't know, but the Media certainly aren't helping matters....
 
Inept Tory government - blame the media, the same media that, for the most part is supposedly hell bent on keeping Labour out of power

Gove did guarantee with absolute certainty that teachers and children will be safe and, yes, it would be great to see the scientific advice behind this and every government decision where such advice is given ... tumbleweed ... tumbleweed
 
Inept Tory government - blame the media, the same media that, for the most part is supposedly hell bent on keeping Labour out of power

Gove did guarantee with absolute certainty that teachers and children will be safe and, yes, it would be great to see the scientific advice behind this and every government decision where such advice is given ... tumbleweed ... tumbleweed
Funnily enough I took issue with Andrew Neil when he interviewed Jeremy Corbyn during the election campaign for exactly the same thing. Gove stammered around the subject like the wally he is, but it doesn't get away from the fact that by pursuing the headline, Marr has failed to [properly inform the British Public. He got what he wanted, which was to flummox Gove into providing a media soundbite, but unfortunately the Public are being misinformed as a result.
 
It just frustrates me, because it's the public who are the loser here... Marr get's his 'prey' and the headlines focus on the narrow agenda "Gove fails to guarantee safety in Schools".

We have the same problem with this 3 week old 'rising R rate', which every man and his dog is now jumping on to try and undermine Government Policy.

Maybe we need Government to make more detailed information available, I don't know, but the Media certainly aren't helping matters....
The government should have provided the detailed information from the start as they got it, particularly regarding who's most at risk, which isn't the children.

Until we get a vaccine, there will be deaths.
He would have been better comparing the expected C19 death rates, with the pre vaccine measles death rates which were pretty horrendous, but society carried on regardless.
 
Because your daughter is very likely one of a limited number of kids who will actually be benefitting from that level of attention at home wiz.

Yes, of course testing is some kind of reassurance.

We know that the evidence suggests limited transmission from kids and that kids and healthy young adults are not at risk. So through testing we can quickly identify and transmission in schools and prevent any significant knock on transmission in the community and more importantly in the vulnerable.

And there is no guarantee you might not crash your car, have a heart attack due to a loud bang, die from food poisoning after eating a dodgy kebab or whatever.

So long as the risk to life is not unduly significant then we have no reason to be unduly concerned.

What’s your alternative?
I'm not against a return at all, subject to appropriate measures being in place. It's good enough for adults in every other area of work. Adults in schools too.
 
The government should have provided the detailed information from the start as they got it, particularly regarding who's most at risk, which isn't the children.

Until we get a vaccine, there will be deaths.
He would have been better comparing the expected C19 death rates, with the pre vaccine measles death rates which were pretty horrendous, but society carried on regardless.
Agree, I think giving parents an insight into comparative risk would have been the sensible thing to do. Without wishing to be harsh we've wandered too far into "pot bellied, weary African child with a fly on it's face" terrrtory. That's great if you are trying to persuade people to part with a donation or, in this case, to scare people enough to get an entire country to stay home, but not so good when you need people to start engaging with life again.

So we now need to regain a sense of perspective, understand how the risks compare to other things that we don't get unduly troubled about and rebuild confidence in our schools, workplaces & in our social contact with each other.

I'm not sure if it is just me who's noticed, but I think some people actually think you can catch it from making eye contact with another human being.
 
Because your daughter is very likely one of a limited number of kids who will actually be benefitting from that level of attention at home wiz.

Yes, of course testing is some kind of reassurance.

We know that the evidence suggests limited transmission from kids and that kids and healthy young adults are not at risk. So through testing we can quickly identify and transmission in schools and prevent any significant knock on transmission in the community and more importantly in the vulnerable.

And there is no guarantee you might not crash your car, have a heart attack due to a loud bang, die from food poisoning after eating a dodgy kebab or whatever.

So long as the risk to life is not unduly significant then we have no reason to be unduly concerned.

What’s your alternative?
Mine would be Stay Home, Stay Safe, Protect As Many As You Can - people are adaptable, we’ve already proven that - I just don’t understand the rush to get back out there just yet is all.
 
BFC x3 , I’ve never read any or your diatribes. If you can’t explain yourself in two sentences I’m not interested ✌️
 
He would have been better comparing the expected C19 death rates, with the pre vaccine measles death rates which were pretty horrendous, but society carried on regardless.

Not sure whether you’ve confused measles cases, which were a lot, with deaths caused by measles there, Donk, but U.K. deaths due to measles from 1946 to 1967, the year before the vaccine was introduced, were 3609 according to the Gov.UK website
 
Mine would be Stay Home, Stay Safe, Protect As Many As You Can - people are adaptable, we’ve already proven that - I just don’t understand the rush to get back out there just yet is all.
That's cool, but it's not for me...
 
It just frustrates me, because it's the public who are the loser here... Marr get's his 'prey' and the headlines focus on the narrow agenda "Gove fails to guarantee safety in Schools".

We have the same problem with this 3 week old 'rising R rate', which every man and his dog is now jumping on to try and undermine Government Policy.

Maybe we need Government to make more detailed information available, I don't know, but the Media certainly aren't helping matters....
It’s the media’s job to stir up crap, for totally self serving purposes as we know.
 
Must admit this stay safe statement is unworkable, yes I know it's only a strapline, all we can possibly do is reduce the risk as best we can.
 
To be fair, the government are giving them plenty of crap to stir
Any politician does. Each political party or voter cites press misrepresentation and bias. Particularly Labour voters who cannot stand most of the press due to owner influence.
Not saying that isn’t valid, but you can’t then claim to support the press when they support your ideals when infact you often cry in the other direction if it goes against your own leanings.
You can, but it’s hypocritical.
 
Not sure whether you’ve confused measles cases, which were a lot, with deaths caused by measles there, Donk, but U.K. deaths due to measles from 1946 to 1967, the year before the vaccine was introduced, were 3609 according to the Gov.UK website
Assuming those were child deaths, then perhaps Covid is not quite as bad as Measles.... Annual Flu is probably a more reasonable comparison, although still probably a bit worse than Covid.
 
Assuming those were child deaths, then perhaps Covid is not quite as bad as Measles.... Annual Flu is probably a more reasonable comparison, although still probably a bit worse than Covid.
Agreed.
My granddaughter has been to a heavily populated school throughout lockdown. She’s also been around 5 members of the family with covid related symptoms and hasn’t had as much as a sniffle or cough .
I think we all reasonably accept there is limited impact on kids if we are 100% honest.
If not let’s take all the kids of keyworkers out of schools with immediate affect and see the moaning begin then when your food supplies are cut off, nurses don’t turn up and benefits don’t get paid. Protect one then protect them all . Or accept the stats, stop moaning and do yourself what you have expected from others and their children 🤬
 
Not sure whether you’ve confused measles cases, which were a lot, with deaths caused by measles there, Donk, but U.K. deaths due to measles from 1946 to 1967, the year before the vaccine was introduced, were 3609 according to the Gov.UK website
It depends how far you go back, but there have been a small number of UK deaths even since the vaccination program started.
(140,000 deaths in 2018 World wide according to WHO)

It was bad when my parents were at school, but the year I started there were a dozen or so deaths, the the year a left less than ten.
We had no lock down, and most of us caught measles.
Last year thankfully there were none.

My point is, with the proposed return of children to school, what are the predicted death rates for children from C19 (or any other disease), better or worse than when the children's parents were at school?
 
Assuming those were child deaths, then perhaps Covid is not quite as bad as Measles.... Annual Flu is probably a more reasonable comparison, although still probably a bit worse than Covid.
They were mostly children according to WHO
 
I was going to do a other todays Tory lie thread but every interview that Give did today was so full of them that it could not be condensed down to a single one.
 
Any risk is comparable in terms of the current risk figure you are exposing to your child to, as are the chances of being hit by lighting.

Edit:
I said 'pre' measles vaccination, which was introduced in1963, with child deaths over 100 with no lockdown.

So for example: Are the government predicting a nolockdown figure which is better or worse than that?
 
Last edited:
Any risk is comparable in terms of the current risk figure you are exposing to your child to, as are the chances of being hit by lighting.
Yes, that's not quite what I meant. Also, I was speed reading and lost the point that this thread is referring to children. Anyhow, measles is creeping back due to lower vaccination uptakes. It is far more transmissible than Covid 19 with R0 of 12-18. This is a risk some parents seem prepared to take, which sums up the madness of all this. I had measles as a kid. It's not very pleasant.
 
Back
Top