Ya what ? He was the best player first half and got hacked down about 3 times and they all got booked. He came on away at sheff United and changed the game and we scored a winner. Please don’t post stupid shite.Discuss
Not on Saturday at sheff United he was completely anonymous.He's a quality player but in starting terms Bowler is a far better player.
Totally agree ….. Bowler should get the nod every timeHe's a quality player but in starting terms Bowler is a far better player.
WrongDiscuss
Best post on this threadFor me it's Bowler in home games and Mitchell for away games. Gabriel was given no support against Sheff Utd by Bowler. Mitchell is better at supporting, Bowler is better when we attacking.
Agreed. Bowler was poor against the Blades and that’ll often be the case with young pacy wingers - consistency is the challenge.He wasn't great tonight but neither was Jerry, we tend to forgive the odd bad game (or even 2-3 in a row) for certain players based on an invisible goodwill meter, Mitchell has shown enough for me that he deserves chances to prove himself at this level (would start Bowler on Sat though personally), pressure is on him to perform next chance he gets though because there's very capable players looking to take his spot.
Bang on post is that Paulsboutique.When we had the ball on the floor in the first half he was clearly really worrying Stoke. As shown by the 3 yellow cards shown for fouls on him, 2 of which were deep in our half and rather unnecessary.
In the 2nd half when we decided to lump balls to the 7foot 5 Stoke backline he was clearly going to struggle.
Quality player for me.
1 goal in 46 appearances ?Another poor post by the O/P who’s getting to be a habitual bedwetter.
Mitchell offers pace, skill, defensive tracking and awareness plus a threat of goals too.
End of last season and start of this he was one of our best players. Last night he caused a lot of issues on the counter attack but faded second half.
That’s what he offers unlike your piss poor post
His energy forces teams into mistakes he’s a good player with the correct attitude he will do fine under critch.1 goal in 46 appearances ?
Without sounding ultra-negative , Mitchell leads the counter attacks very well. However , he is seriously lacking in end product.
As is Bowler let’s be honestHowever , he is seriously lacking in end product.
You need to give your head a wobble.Another poor post by the O/P who’s getting to be a habitual bedwetter.
Mitchell offers pace, skill, defensive tracking and awareness plus a threat of goals too.
End of last season and start of this he was one of our best players. Last night he caused a lot of issues on the counter attack but faded second half.
That’s what he offers unlike your piss poor post
So they were scared stiff of him, he drew 3 bookings and helped nullify any threat down their left, until we went off?You need to give your head a wobble.
He's weak. In this division he's not strong enough. Powderpuff.
By H-T, the ref had dished out 5 yellows to Stoke. All correct.We struggle against big physical well drilled sides Keshi got clattered from behind countless times. A poor referee who.lost his grip on the game in the first half didnt help.
We tend to run out of ideas when we get bullied in games like tonight. I thought we were solid at the back, we just didnt get the rub of the green. We need to create more chances but I'm sure that will come.
Well said SteveWe have players who on their day are some of the best in the league and can run people ragged. However not everyone has a good day everyday. Mitchell puts the yards in and he can frighten defenders who try to pin him down. He is a dangerous player for us. And so is Bowler, he can run rings round defenders on his day and he is a very dangerous player. With Mr Critchley in charge these could turn into superplayers and may well turn out to be big players even in a higher division. That makes it all the more interesting when CJ returns because if his former talent is still with him then who the hell do you pick? Who do leave out? Lets just trust in our manager, he hasn't done badly so far. It was good to see Charlie last night who was very diplomatic in his chat with the fans.
The general consensus is that he had a stinker last night....as did Carey.Ya what ? He was the best player first half and got hacked down about 3 times and they all got booked. He came on away at sheff United and changed the game and we scored a winner. Please don’t post stupid shite.
Carey had a stinkerThe general consensus is that he had a stinker last night....as did Carey.
What he saidSo they were scared stiff of him, he drew 3 bookings and helped nullify any threat down their left, until we went off?
Interested to know if you picked him out as key to the positive change in our performance at Sheffield?
Your post is powderpuff, lacking in anything remotely resembling football knowledge.