From the article that you provided:
Professor Song said: “This screening programme identified 300 asymptomatic cases. But the virus cultures indicated no viable virus in the identified asymptomatic cases. This means that these people were not likely to infect anyone else.”
Some discussion and studies referenced in the link below, including the one you refer to above
This is why I can never take anything he says seriously. We were doing pretty much the same amount of tests as 4 weeks ago but the difference is we now have 4 times more positive results. Opening the country back up now could put us into a more severe lockdown in a very short space of time.One slight little problem with the OP's theory that it's all down to increased testing:
View attachment 6780
The test positivity rate has gone up by a factor of 4 since early April.
What if the cases are the same in 3 weeks? What happens then? Or is it ok whatever in 3 weeks “FFS”.This is why I can never take anything he says seriously. We were doing pretty much the same amount of tests as 4 weeks ago but the difference is we now have 4 times more positive results. Opening the country back up now could put us into a more severe lockdown in a very short space of time.
Most things are open now, you can see, hug and spend time with your family indoors and outdoors. Pubs and restaurants are open etc. 3 more weeks to wait ffs and hopefully this is all behind us for good.
If they are the same in 3 weeks then we should be ok. If it keeps increasing by 20/30% each week then we might be in trouble. We will see the full extent of the vaccine program by then and if we are having fewer than 100 deaths a day then it will be a good result.What if the cases are the same in 3 weeks? What happens then? Or is it ok whatever in 3 weeks “FFS”.
Things might be open, but they aren’t operating at anything like they would class as normal, it’s insulting to think they are.
A few issues...22,868 cases today, 3 (three) deaths.
The last time cases were at around 22,000 and rising was in early December, when there were roughly 400 Covid deaths a day and the second wave was starting to spiral.
There are currently on average 211 Covid hospital admissions each day across the UK, in early December, the country was averaging 1,500 daily hospitalisations.
* FAO Lost please go and check these numbers but all are correct
Local and nationally schools closing due to positive tests and stupid isolating rules.
This nonsense needs to stop, the cult of Covid fear is out of control.
A few issues...
1. Monday Death Data has been consistently problematic, so there's often a big hangover after a weekend, resulting in a very low Monday then very high Tuesday/Wednesday as data catches up.
So we’re in a better place than October then which caused the ‘Circuit breaker’... that’s good news thenA few issues...
1. Monday Death Data has been consistently problematic, so there's often a big hangover after a weekend, resulting in a very low Monday then very high Tuesday/Wednesday as data catches up.
2. December is not a good comparison, due to our position in the epidemic cycle... 15-20th October is a more relevant comparison in terms of where we were with case numbers, though as you acknowledge yourself, we are testing far more people now and therefore this may well be impacting on the ratio of cases to deaths....
3. Hospital admissions data is almost 1 week out of date at the present time.
Clearly we are all hoping and expecting to see a situation where hospitalisations and deaths, but it's conceivable that in reality (bearing in mind we were testing less than half the number of people back in October) that in reality our current situation might be more reflective of where we were in early October and at a time when deaths were around 60 or so per day on average (dramatically different from the 400 mentioned in your post)...
You are absolutely right that we need to get going and reopen up our country as soon as possible, but we also need to be able to do that in a way that is sustainable.... The last thing we need is the threat of NHS collapse and a return to lockdown..It would be a complete disaster.
So the current policy to delay for a few more weeks to assess the data, given all we have been through seems to be the right choice...
The end is already nigh… The government / Tory party are desperate to reopen the Country. It’s simply a matter of ensuring we are where we think we are…So we’re in a better place than October then which caused the ‘Circuit breaker’... that’s good news then
With a few of the expert scientists jumping on board too it looks like the end is nigh
We aren’t fixating on cases, we are trying to give ourselves time to properly evaluate death and hospitalisation data.
If we were fixating on cases, then we’d be going back into full scale lockdown right now ffs.
Well if that happens I assume we would be talking about the vaccine not working.Yep.
I think 122 deaths reported over the last 7 days, but that's going to be a result of infections when case numbers were ~ 25% of where we are today, so potentially we might be looking at 500/week in a few weeks time.
If cases were to spike to say 100k per day that could possibly translate into 2,000 - 3,000 deaths per week at which point we would very definitely be looking at a return to some sort of lockdown.
There's still a lot of unknowns out there.
It’s spitting!! Everybody in!!! Run for your lives!!Yep.
I think 122 deaths reported over the last 7 days, but that's going to be a result of infections when case numbers were ~ 25% of where we are today, so potentially we might be looking at 500/week in a few weeks time.
If cases were to spike to say 100k per day that could possibly translate into 2,000 - 3,000 deaths per week at which point we would very definitely be looking at a return to some sort of lockdown.
There's still a lot of unknowns out there.
I think we've found Prof Neil Ferguson's AVFTT accountYep.
I think 122 deaths reported over the last 7 days, but that's going to be a result of infections when case numbers were ~ 25% of where we are today, so potentially we might be looking at 500/week in a few weeks time.
If cases were to spike to say 100k per day that could possibly translate into 2,000 - 3,000 deaths per week at which point we would very definitely be looking at a return to some sort of lockdown.
There's still a lot of unknowns out there.
Not at all.... We could be talking about a) Not enough people having had the vaccine b) A virus that has increased transmissibilityWell if that happens I assume we would be talking about the vaccine not working.
Except you've got the idiots who don't see the need to be vaccinated because it tags them.Not at all.... We could be talking about a) Not enough people having had the vaccine b) A virus that has increased transmissibility
The whole point of the delay is to give ourselves time to vaccinate sufficient individuals to try and head off the situation. It'd not difficult to see that things are finely balanced and that there is a race between vaccination and virus..... Had we not seen the virus kicking off as it had, then the June 21st deadline wouldn't have been an issue...
On your figures that’s over 150,000 deaths a year, we have given out over 70,000,000 vaccinations, unless there a new variant that defeats the vaccine then that’s probably not realistic figures. Unless your saying the vaccine doesn’t work of course.Not at all.... We could be talking about a) Not enough people having had the vaccine b) A virus that has increased transmissibility
The whole point of the delay is to give ourselves time to vaccinate sufficient individuals to try and head off the situation. It'd not difficult to see that things are finely balanced and that there is a race between vaccination and virus..... Had we not seen the virus kicking off as it had, then the June 21st deadline wouldn't have been an issue...
On my figures ?On your figures that’s over 150,000 deaths a year, we have given out over 70,000,000 vaccinations, unless there a new variant that defeats the vaccine then that’s probably not realistic figures. Unless your saying the vaccine doesn’t work of course.
So when should we be allowed to live again, following your numbers ?On my figures ?
We have around 32,000,000 people fully vaccinated as things stand. The vaccine is 67% effective…perhaps moreso at preventing death.
So arguably we have a protected population of around 21, 500,000 people… That’s only equivalent to 41% of the adult population… Of course, many of those double vaccinated people will also not have developed full immunity, which takes 15+ days…
So it wouldn’t require the vaccine not to work at all, just a transmissible virus and sufficient numbers of cases.
Up until now we’ve always stopped transmission in its tracks by adopting a lockdown approach. So there’s every reason to expect that cases could develop beyond previously experienced levels… So we need to understand exactly to what extent the balance between case numbers to deaths has changed as a result of vaccination and also give ourselves the extra time required to increase the number of vaccinated individuals.
They’re not my numbers, but it depends on what happens really.So when should we be allowed to live again, following your numbers ?
Well if that happens I assume we would be talking about the vaccine not working.
The peak death rate was about 9,000/week, however peak (7 day average) cases was 60.000, so 100,000 pre vaccine might translate to 15,000 - 20,000 deaths p/w, so in that context 2,500 is what happens if the vaccine is working.
As I said, there's vast amounts of uncertainty about everything covid, it is understandable if the government doesn't want to find the answer during a worst case scenario.
OK let me rephrase mine. There's no moral and simple way to end the pandemicThere is, it's called herd immunity.