Raging_Bull
Well-known member
I've just read that Southgate claims that Marcus Rashford has done "really well" and was a "threat" in justifying not putting Jack Grealish on the other night.
Now the jury may still be out on Jack although he has had a promising start to his England career so I'm not advocating he should have gone on, however the only thing Rashford had "done well" at recently is his campaign to stop hunger in kids, and he's as much use as a chocolate fireguard in terms as a "threat' to opposing international teams defences recently. As Roy Keane rightly pointed out Rashford was going through the motions against Belgium, he went on to actually do less than that in the Denmark game.
Southgate needs to get a grip and remember we can see what he sees and players cannot hide. Rashford's form is shocking.
Now the jury may still be out on Jack although he has had a promising start to his England career so I'm not advocating he should have gone on, however the only thing Rashford had "done well" at recently is his campaign to stop hunger in kids, and he's as much use as a chocolate fireguard in terms as a "threat' to opposing international teams defences recently. As Roy Keane rightly pointed out Rashford was going through the motions against Belgium, he went on to actually do less than that in the Denmark game.
Southgate needs to get a grip and remember we can see what he sees and players cannot hide. Rashford's form is shocking.