JJpool
Well-known member
1st half was pretty decent, totally dominant but let down either the final pass and of course scoring goals. Should have been further ahead really from all that domination.
Cambridge looked awful, barley touched the ball and no shots at all, basically offered nothing.
So how did we go in at half time and come out utterly toothless and allow them to compete?
2nd half we looked mostly clueless, poor passing, bad touches, wrong choices, no real goal threat etc.
Ffs we were kicking towards the north stand and that's all we could do.
We won but we are not a side threatening the playoffs based on that and some of the past performances, there's just not enough goal threat, too much wrong.
Where do people sit on who's at fault?
Ultimately the manager is responsible and we have seen us get a lot of good results at home, with some decent enough performances, so we can do it.
At times you have to blame the players for simply not being good enough, poor touches etc, moves breaking down.
But again it does come back to the manager, people blamed Appleton, Mick for our relegation, players making mistakes, it was the players too but they were not performing, we actually had some decent talent in that side. Ultimately a manger gives them confidence in how they play, gets the best out of them.
But are we really saying that someone else would have us purring? I suppose it's possible, because confidence can change a player from shit to great, but really is it likely?
Cambridge looked awful, barley touched the ball and no shots at all, basically offered nothing.
So how did we go in at half time and come out utterly toothless and allow them to compete?
2nd half we looked mostly clueless, poor passing, bad touches, wrong choices, no real goal threat etc.
Ffs we were kicking towards the north stand and that's all we could do.
We won but we are not a side threatening the playoffs based on that and some of the past performances, there's just not enough goal threat, too much wrong.
Where do people sit on who's at fault?
Ultimately the manager is responsible and we have seen us get a lot of good results at home, with some decent enough performances, so we can do it.
At times you have to blame the players for simply not being good enough, poor touches etc, moves breaking down.
But again it does come back to the manager, people blamed Appleton, Mick for our relegation, players making mistakes, it was the players too but they were not performing, we actually had some decent talent in that side. Ultimately a manger gives them confidence in how they play, gets the best out of them.
But are we really saying that someone else would have us purring? I suppose it's possible, because confidence can change a player from shit to great, but really is it likely?
Last edited: