1966_and_all_that
Well-known member
I disagree.We didn't lose because of the starting 11
I disagree.We didn't lose because of the starting 11
we didn't win because of the starting eleven and wins happen to be more important than draws if you hadn't realised it.
It's lucky that you don't understand the professional game.we didn't win because of the starting eleven and wins happen to be more important than draws if you hadn't realised it.
Understand it way better than you. You come on here to be nothing more than a wum. You contribute the square root of fuck all to football discussion. By the way, where has that dickhead mate of yours Kingzobo disappeared to.It's lucky that you don't understand the professional game.
If you were the manager we'd have been relegated before Christmas....
Mind you, if you'd been running the line we'd not have conceded as many goals......would we
No it wasn't ,because as we didn't waist time passing it around at the back and got the ball upfield as quick as possible Madine was getting plenty of the ball and was having the best game he had played for weeks. That was until he lost his head and assaulted their player. We just needed that bit of luck and their man being sent off for the pull back on Yates who was through on goal.Yates was right wing. Madine was on his own upfront supported by Carey. It was a throwback to Appleton.
It was awful Madine was upfront by himself with the ball just launched to him from every possible angleNo it wasn't ,because as we didn't waist time passing it around at the back and got the ball upfield as quick as possible Madine was getting plenty of the ball and was having the best game he had played for weeks. That was until he lost his head and assaulted their player. We just needed that bit of luck and their man being sent off for the pull back on Yates who was through on goal.
How long have we been asking not to play it around at the back and get the ball forward . When Madine was on the pitch he was getting plenty of the ball . When he went off thats when we started losing possession more,but I bet they were told to get the ball up the other end as quickly as possible and that's what I want and most others.The back four are crap, with the exception of Lyons, all they do is hit a long high ball to the opposition and back it comes. Unable to pass it out because sorry but they ain’t good enough. We need Marv back alongside Thorniley, Gabriel and Lyons as full backs- Not going to happen for a while and may be too late. However a win Saturday will be most welcome
Yes ,we were always fighting back with Appleton to get points.Rubbish
It's got nothing to do with Appleton we are on about the McCarthy style of play that doesn't encourage any football with the ball just booted in the airYes ,we were always fighting back with Appleton to get points.
No it wasn't ,because as we didn't waist time passing it around at the back and got the ball upfield as quick as possible Madine was getting plenty of the ball and was having the best game he had played for weeks. That was until he lost his head and assaulted their player. We just needed that bit of luck and their man being sent off for the pull back on Yates who was through on goal.
yep, the football was dire but I do agree for once with WOT in that that style of play does suit Madine and up to his sending off I thought he was playing really well.It was awful Madine was upfront by himself with the ball just launched to him from every possible angle
It was shite football
Probably the worst I've ever seen at Bloomfield Road
But do we really want to watch our better players just sat on the bench?yep, the football was dire but I do agree for once with WOT in that that style of play does suit Madine and up to his sending off I thought he was playing really well.
Are you not one of the fans that posted that you didn't care about how points were won ,you just wanted MM to save us from relegation. Well if not ,most of us were . He's had 1 game in charge of a game we were likely to win and you don't know how his tactics are going to be for the rest of the season . He may adapt different tactics for different games .You have no idea. So why don't you wait for 5or 6 games and then see what happens . You may look stupid jumping in too early and don't get me wrong after a few boring games that we lose, I will join you.It's got nothing to do with Appleton we are on about the McCarthy style of play that doesn't encourage any football with the ball just booted in the air
No it wasn't ,because as we didn't waist time passing it around at the back and got the ball upfield as quick as possible Madine was getting plenty of the ball and was having the best game he had played for weeks. That was until he lost his head and assaulted their player. We just needed that bit of luck and their man being sent off for the pull back on Yates who was through on goal.
clearly for some reason some do. IF,IF,IF it gets us the wins we need then fair enough but I suppose for now we'll have to see how it pans out. Saturdays team selection will be interesting. Can't really second guess what he'll do but I'll be surprised if Carey starts.But do we really want to watch our better players just sat on the bench?
We now actually have the wingers we have been crying out for all season and we aren't playing them or to their strengths
It's shite .........
I don't think we will get the points needed playing that way with the players we haveAre you not one of the fans that posted that you didn't care about how points were won ,you just wanted MM to save us from relegation. Well if not ,most of us were . He's had 1 game in charge of a game we were likely to win and you don't know how his tactics are going to be for the rest of the season . He may adapt different tactics for different games .You have no idea. So why don't you wait for 5or 6 games and then see what happens . You may look stupid jumping in too early and don't get me wrong after a few boring games that we lose, I will join you.
CJ 's game has improved and Bowler has been promised a starting place as long as he works hard coming back .I don't think we will get the points needed playing that way with the players we have
Might as well send Poveda, Bowler and Patino back if they aren't going to start
Cj Hamilton in front of Bowler, Rogers and Poveda is just fcuked up
I’m not so sure ”most others” are happy with the big hoof out of defence. But we‘re all entitled to our own opinions without being castigated by another fanHow long have we been asking not to play it around at the back and get the ball forward . When Madine was on the pitch he was getting plenty of the ball . When he went off thats when we started losing possession more,but I bet they were told to get the ball up the other end as quickly as possible and that's what I want and most others.
Also before you can call our back 4 being crap ,you do a better job . Its easy to insult people if you are good at being a couch potato.
you're making that up. Show me any evidence that Bowler has been promised a place? No manager would do that and nor should he. Telling a player what he needs to do is most certainly not promising him a place.CJ 's game has improved and Bowler has been promised a starting place as long as he works hard coming back .
Who is Kingzobo?Understand it way better than you. You come on here to be nothing more than a wum. You contribute the square root of fuck all to football discussion. By the way, where has that dickhead mate of yours Kingzobo disappeared to.
you're just an anonymous bullshitter who hasn't got the capability or capacity to discuss/debate or argue about football. Your posting history shows you have nothing to say whatsoever apart from being a wum and moaning about other posters.Who is Kingzobo?
I'm not sad enough to let AVFTT be that big a part of my life.
You don't discuss or debate. You simply give a point of view that you, in your little world think is right..... always, and you argue for days to try to prove a point that is blatantly wrong....
You can't know more about football than most people because you don't even know the rules
Read the opyou're just an anonymous bullshitter who hasn't got the capability or capacity to discuss/debate or argue about football. Your posting history shows you have nothing to say whatsoever apart from being a wum and moaning about other posters.
I said promise him a place if he works hard and I don't lie.you're making that up. Show me any evidence that Bowler has been promised a place? No manager would do that and nor should he. Telling a player what he needs to do is most certainly not promising him a place.
Only McCarthy can promise him a place and like I said I don't believe he would do that. You and I can't make promises that are impossible to keep.I said promise him a place if he works hard and I don't lie.
your thread title was you moaning fuckers. Now what was that all about if not about the fans having a dig at tuesday nights performance. It's barely three weeks since you said you hoped McCarthys brand of football was better than Appletons. Well so far it seems to be much worse and it still isn't getting the results. Bit of a hypocrite and double standards sort of person are you?Read the op
I saw it in a pop up on google . If it comes up again ,i will let you know where its come from.Only McCarthy can promise him a place and like I said I don't believe he would do that. You and I can't make promises that are impossible to keep.
It was on Lancslive and the article was written by John McdougallI saw it in a pop up on google . If it comes up again ,i will let you know where its come from.
your thread title was you moaning fuckers. Now what was that all about if not about the fans having a dig at tuesday nights performance. It's barely three weeks since you said you hoped McCarthys brand of football was better than Appletons. Well so far it seems to be much worse and it still isn't getting the result.
your thread title was you moaning fuckers. Now what was that all about if not about the fans having a dig at tuesday nights performance. It's barely three weeks since you said you hoped McCarthys brand of football was better than Appletons. Well so far it seems to be much worse and it still isn't getting the results. Bit of a hypocrite and double standards sort of person are you?
Firstly, you sad sad man.your thread title was you moaning fuckers. Now what was that all about if not about the fans having a dig at tuesday nights performance. It's barely three weeks since you said you hoped McCarthys brand of football was better than Appletons. Well so far it seems to be much worse and it still isn't getting the results. Bit of a hypocrite and double standards sort of person are you?
but was it a direct quote by McCarthy that he "promised" Bowler a place. I doubt it very much.It was on Lancslive and the article was written by John Mcdougall
What he says is that Bowler has great ability and he was played in midfield to see if he could get extra from him . If he works hard he should never be left out of the stating line up . If you google MM on my computer all the latest news and quotes about him are on there ,so you may be able to read it yourself.but was it a direct quote by McCarthy that he "promised" Bowler a place. I doubt it very much.
Brilliant stuff you utter clown.. Go and look at my posting history over the last few days. I've said a few times that I came away from the ground buzzing. Lee Charles video if you want to check. I've also said that the team put in a helluva shift to stay in the game with their workrate. I've said Madine was having a very good game up to his sending off. The ball wasn't moved quiclky, it was lumped forward quickly. There was no plan to get the ball down and pass it for pretty much any area on the pitch. Our midfield could only simply look upwards whenever either Maxwell or any of our defenders had the ball. Totally bypassed. And who the fuck is Douglas, not the first time you've called DOUGALL, Douglas is it?Firstly, you sad sad man.
Who on earth looks back to posts made three weeks ago?
Would you not agree that that the team put in a hell of a lot more effort than previously this season?
Even Madine was sprinting and closing down.
The ball was moved quickly and the tackles were plenty.
Douglas was more advanced and more mobile, the whole starting team put in a shift.
Trybul was excellent, Nelson was immense.
There were improvements all over the pitch but still some people moan.
Had Madine not been sent off we, I am under no doubt, would have won.
Is Madines indiscretion MMs fault? Was Nelson's mistake that lead to the first goal down to MM.
Carey's miss in the first half.....Mick's fault?
All players who many many people would have chosen to start....
Some people are glass half full some half empty. You are the latter......always critical due to your superior knowledge of the game.
I think we did play better than quite a few games, intact most.
14 players put in a great shift. One let the manager and supporters down.
10 men against another team scrambling like us is a great result ....
Yep, but it's your use of the word promise. You pretty much admit he "promised" him no such thing. And like I said, nor would he.What he says is that Bowler has great ability and he was played in midfield to see if he could get extra from him . If he works hard he should never be left out of the stating line up . If you google MM on my computer all the latest news and quotes about him are on there ,so you may be able to read it yourself.
Ok ,but if it makes you feel better it looks like he will be starting the next game.Yep, but it's your use of the word promise. You pretty much admit he "promised" him no such thing. And like I said, nor would he.
If he doesn't start and we win then no problem. Said that a few times already. It's if we don't win and it's the same brand of football and no Bowler that I will have a problem with.Ok ,but if it makes you feel better it looks like he will be starting the next game.
I can accept that ,and probably agree with it ,but I won't have a go until he has had a few games at what he thinks is best .If he doesn't start and we win then no problem. Said that a few times already. It's if we don't win and it's the same brand of football and no Bowler that I will have a problem with.
Ooo, touched a nerve have I....get a life away from here before you give yourself a stroke.Brilliant stuff you utter clown.. Go and look at my posting history over the last few days. I've said a few times that I came away from the ground buzzing. Lee Charles video if you want to check. I've also said that the team put in a helluva shift to stay in the game with their workrate. I've said Madine was having a very good game up to his sending off. The ball wasn't moved quiclky, it was lumped forward quickly. There was no plan to get the ball down and pass it for pretty much any area on the pitch. Our midfield could only simply look upwards whenever either Maxwell or any of our defenders had the ball. Totally bypassed. And who the fuck is Douglas, not the first time you've called DOUGALL, Douglas is it?
You've only speculation to rely on for thinking we'd have won. Based on the square root of nothing. We created one chance in that first half? Some improvement that eh? Have I blamed MM for Madines sending off, or Careys miss? Nope, so why make stuff up that has no relevance. Tell me about these many people who you say would have selected the players to start? And then go and have a look at the matchday thread when the team was announced an hour before kick off. Any criticism from me? . Nope, just a comment that I was a bit surprised but would wait to see how it goes?
If you think we played better than in most other games then you're entitled to your opinion but I'd suggest the strength of feeling on here is that we didn't!
And finally, go again and have a look at my posting history and read that I'm fine with hoofball if it gets the wins we need. Now even with eleven men on the pitch for the first half, hoofball wasn't bringing us any success but Huddersfield still managed to score. So yep, damn right I'll question why McCarthy didn't change his tactics as soon as we went one down. It was fifty minutes later when he decided to introduce Bowler which the fans had been clamouring for since shortly after half time. And yep, it was Bowler getting on the ball which made a difference.
So off you pop, and start doing your checks.
It's you whose getting wind up you clown. See you don't cover my previous reply to you. That's because you were talking utter bullshit. It was your thread title you moaning fucker! Some Blackpool fan you are who hasn't a clue about a players name.Ooo, touched a nerve have I....get a life away from here before you give yourself a stroke.
You won't leave it though because you just can't can you?
It eats away at you doesn't it.....Douglas, Dougal, Dougall....what does it matter....I'll tell you what it matters sunshine....diddly squat, just like your rants and the sanctimonious bull that you spout and seem to believe.
If you read through the thread from the op you might realise that people have different opinions.
You can't seem to get that into your head and I think you actually believe that what you write is always a barometer for everything Blackpool FC.
100% you'll reply because that's you....never wrong......sad man
I aim to please.20togo v Ginge
Classic, you've both made my day, superb
I'll get the landing netIt's you whose getting wind up you clown. See you don't cover my previous reply to you. That's because you were talking utter bullshit. It was your thread title you moaning fucker! Some Blackpool fan you are who hasn't a clue about a players name.
see you're back, you really can't help it can you. Anyway thanks for the compliment that I think I'm never wrong. Bit better than being never right like you eh!I'll get the landing net
I like your idea of 2 goalkeepersThought Nelson did well, and a shame about Goode.
Lyons, Bowler, and Rogers must start.
Carey and CJ just not good enough - fine as subs.
My 11 would be:
Maxi / Grimmy
Lyons, Nelson, Husband, DT.
Connolly, Trybul, Dougal, Rogers.
Yates, Bowler.
In the keepnet you gosee you're back, you really can't help it can you. Anyway thanks for the compliment that I think I'm never wrong. Bit better than being never right like you eh!
but you know full well I 'm not going anywhere. He'll scuttle off long before I do. He's still got this problem with me taking the piss out of him a few months back. And he thinks I'm in his keepnet!Just keep having a pop at 20s he can't resist
well if that's his goal in life then let's see if he comes back. Like I said, I tend to think he's in my keepnet and it's me reeling him in.But come on he deserves his first ton before he loses his cherry