7YearCritch
Well-known member
Did you agree with Grimshaw not lobbing the ball to a free Joseph and keeping hold of it?
Yes, in part because Joseph wasn't free, he had 2-3 players close to him.Did you agree with Grimshaw not lobbing the ball to a free Joseph and keeping hold of it?
No. Joseph had a couple of yards on the nearest pursuer and a whole half to run into.Did you agree with Grimshaw not lobbing the ball to a free Joseph and keeping hold of it?
In the stands there is a better view from higher up actually. Easier to see the wider picture from there.Nobody sat in the stands has the view and/or experience to decide what and where to throw/kick the ball.
Only the players on the pitch.
NoDid you agree with Grimshaw not lobbing the ball to a free Joseph and keeping hold of it?
Games like that when you're 2-0 up, and there is little threat from the opposition is when you go for the jugular, and push up the goal difference. Could understand it if the actually play had been closely matched. Letting the ball go early isn't generally something grimmy does.Nobody sat in the stands has the view and/or experience to decide what and where to throw/kick the ball.
Only the players on the pitch.
That's a load of rubbish, depending on where you are of course you might have much better view and if you think Grimshaw is the only authority on goalkeeping then you are mistaken.Nobody sat in the stands has the view and/or experience to decide what and where to throw/kick the ball.
Onlythe players on the pitch.
And that is one of the reasons I think Norburn is one of the teams biggest issues, there was so little steam in yesterday's game, and Exeter were dire, the latter stages of the game were the opportunity to really go for the kill, and give the supporters something to cheer.Norburn shouted at him to hold it and to take some steam out of the game. Think Grimmy would have kept hold of it anyway.
Because if they counter and make it 2-1 everyone wets the bed and calla him naive.No. Joseph had a couple of yards on the nearest pursuer and a whole half to run into.
We immediately lost possession from the eventual kick out, so where was the harm in trying to break on a committed opposition? I thought that was supposed to be our strength?
Disagree. No one is going to have a go for trying to attack. People were annoyed because after wasting time allowing their team to regroup, the subsequent kick went straight to them. So the so called safe tactic actually cost us possession.Because if they counter and make it 2-1 everyone wets the bed and calla him naive.
The fucker can't win
If the opportunity's are there you take them.100% we are winning 2-0 why rush things, i know supporters want to attack and be excited, but the odds are he will of lost it and it then comes straight back at us. As they say a time and a place for everything
And rightly so, i totally agreeNorburn shouted at him to hold it and to take some steam out of the game. Think Grimmy would have kept hold of it anyway.
Totally disagree, but that's what all this is about different opinions and respecting other peoples views, i just viewed it with my football head on that's allIf the opportunity's are there you take them.
Just like when we've passed back to work an opening, when you het that opening you don't then go back unnecessarily, you've created the chance to cross, shoot, 1-2, etc.
I can understand more if we were playing better sides in the championship, but were not.
When 2 nil up, against let's be honest many poor sides, we should push on when opportunities present themselves.
It should have been a relatively simple throw or kick from Grimshaw to hit the space for him to run into.
I have seen many comments on here about Exeter being dire/shite etc, but that is because of how we played and not letting them do what they do best, we nullified their style of play so for me full credit to the staff and playersAnd that is one of the reasons I think Norburn is one of the teams biggest issues, there was so little steam in yesterday's game, and Exeter were dire, the latter stages of the game were the opportunity to really go for the kill, and give the supporters something to cheer.
But we do just that on other occasions, we attack when we've created something or an opportunity presented itself, so it's no different.Totally disagree, but that's what all this is about different opinions and respecting other peoples views, i just viewed it with my football head on that's all
There will only be the players who know if the decision was right, i don't like the word IF in football it's to grey you could say that about many things in the game for exampleBut we do just that on other occasions, we attack when we've created something or an opportunity presented itself, so it's no different.
If he did go on and scored from it we're in a far more comfortable position.
There should have been very little risk and we gave the ball away anyway just after.
Where's the fun in that?There will only be the players who know if the decision was right, i don't like the word IF in football it's to grey you could say that about many things in the game for example
IF Rhodes have scored the penalty
IF Dembele's corner hadn't gone out of play
If Grimshaw had thrown it to Joseph
We can only work on facts not if's and buts
I don't know about you, but I watch Blackpool playing a struggling side with less quality than us, when we're 2 ahead, I'd like to see us take the chance to score more when available.There will only be the players who know if the decision was right, i don't like the word IF in football it's to grey you could say that about many things in the game for example
IF Rhodes have scored the penalty
IF Dembele's corner hadn't gone out of play
If Grimshaw had thrown it to Joseph
We can only work on facts not if's and buts
No ,I want entertainment ,but Critch will be happy.Did you agree with Grimshaw not lobbing the ball to a free Joseph and keeping hold of it?
Remember Keshi's goal at Sheffield U. Match winner.If the opportunity's are there you take them.
Just like when we've passed back to work an opening, when you het that opening you don't then go back unnecessarily, you've created the chance to cross, shoot, 1-2, etc.
I can understand more if we were playing better sides in the championship, but were not.
When 2 nil up, against let's be honest many poor sides, we should push on when opportunities present themselves.
It should have been a relatively simple throw or kick from Grimshaw to hit the space for him to run into.
With my football head on No - but yes when the time is right and personally its that word again IF.I don't know about you, but I watch Blackpool playing a struggling side with less quality than us, when we're 2 ahead, I'd like to see us take the chance to score more when available.
If you go 3 up you can probably make more changes earlier.
There isn't any but its a result business and the reality of it all is that its right, every single game is full of if's and but's ,will we ever know the answer to them no.Where's the fun in that?