Abu Dhabi GP

You know as well as I do that the Silverstone crash being Hamilton's fault is very debatable.

You also know as well as I do that the safety car rules weren't followed to make it an 'exciting finish'.

And you're well aware that had this not been the title decider the race would have finished behind the safety car.
Point 1 - It's 70/30 Hamiltons fault and it was extremely ** stupid and one of the most dangerous incidents this season. I like Hamilton, I wanted him to win yesterday. The outrage is just making people look a bit stupid to be honest.

No, I think it would have happened at ANY race, first or last. Allowing Max and Lewis to race was discussed all season.
 
Max didn't gamble, they had to do the opposite of Mercedes, as soon as Lewis went past the pits that was their decision made, if Lewis had dived in RB would have stayed out.
And then he would have overtaken Max on the last lap and none of this crying would be taking place. He had tyres that were 45 laps old. He even said it was stupid they didn't bring him in. New softs >>>>>>>>>>>extremely old Hards.
 
And then he would have overtaken Max on the last lap and none of this crying would be taking place. He had tyres that were 45 laps old. He even said it was stupid they didn't bring him in. New softs >>>>>>>>>>>extremely old Hards.
He'd only have overtaken Max if the same ad-hoc 'let half the lapped cars overtake the safety car' rules had been applied and I'm not sure the RD is consistent from one moment to the next.
 
I agree and disagree with you Kurt, never in F1 history has part of the field been able to unlap themselves. That is what Mercedes based their strategy on, for someone having a dig at newbies to the sport that seems a little off. What I would say to those who haven't watched any/many races this season, is that this bad decision, and make no mistake, that is what is was, isn't the first. Michael Masi has shown himself to be incapable of the job he is being paid to do. Several times his communication has been poor, not least the last 2 races. I'm a casual F1 fan, wouldn't profess to know all 199 pages of the rule book but also know enough to think what happened yesterday stinks, F1 have done themselves no favours.
 
He'd only have overtaken Max if the same ad-hoc 'let half the lapped cars overtake the safety car' rules had been applied and I'm not sure the RD is consistent from one moment to the next.
The exact same scenario would have happened. I don't think we need to pretend there is some sort of bias against Hamilton. I could reel a list of things both him and Max have got away with.
 
I agree and disagree with you Kurt, never in F1 history has part of the field been able to unlap themselves. That is what Mercedes based their strategy on, for someone having a dig at newbies to the sport that seems a little off. What I would say to those who haven't watched any/many races this season, is that this bad decision, and make no mistake, that is what is was, isn't the first. Michael Masi has shown himself to be incapable of the job he is being paid to do. Several times his communication has been poor, not least the last 2 races. I'm a casual F1 fan, wouldn't profess to know all 199 pages of the rule book but also know enough to think what happened yesterday stinks, F1 have done themselves no favours.
Seemed pretty fine to me, track is clear and it's near the last lap. Why wait for another 5/6 cars to go through when you could let people race? It's a race after all, not a follow the safety car round for 6 laps.

He had a pretty impossible job. And I imagine had about 50000 things going on at once. With both Mercedes and Red Bull trying to influence him, which they shouldn't do.

I actually think they shouldn't be able to speak to FIA at all during the race. Only post race.
 
The exact same scenario would have happened. I don't think we need to pretend there is some sort of bias against Hamilton. I could reel a list of things both him and Max have got away with.
It's not an accusation of bias, it's an accusation of inconsistencies from one minute to the next.

Mercedes did the right thing staying out unfer the normal SC rules. The rules weren't adhered to though there's no argument about that surely?

I know youre playing devil's advocate but as an F1 geek you can't be happy with artificially manufacturing a result?
 
Pretty obvious why? It's not indefensible. The track was clear and there was one lap remaining.

If they ended it under the safety car, people would be going mental.

Hamilton had numerous chances to change his, tyres, he didn't knowing full well a safety car would change things. Had it happened 3 or 4 laps earlier no one would be saying anything.
Such a dumb take to avoid stating the obvious, that the rules were broken to change how a F1 race works, meaning that Mercedes didn’t have “numerous chances” to change their tires. If you knew the sport you’d know this but instead you’re the one pretending to know the sport and gatekeep others out.

Mercedes were 100% on the right strategy, they could have changed during the first VSC, however they got that call right and Lewis had a 11second lead with a few laps to go.

There was then a second safety car, which if normal rules were followed would have lead to two differenct scenarios, either cars don’t unlap, and you have a race for a couple laps but Max has to fight through some cars. Or you let them unlap and all cars unlap and the safety car is withdrawn, this would have lasted until the end of the race and Lewis would have won under safety car conditions.

As you should know in the history of F1, it’s never been a case that you can just let a few cars unlap themselves. Your argument is basically that Mercedes got their strategy wrong, when actually their strategy was right, until the race director arbitrarily changed the rules until the strategy was wrong. How can you strategise for a competition of the rules and common understanding of them can be changed on one man’s whim? How could have Mercedes accounted for something that has literally never happened, and is not within the scope of the rules? Not to mention the race director explicitly told Mercedes he’d decided to go for the no unlapping route, were they supposed to just not believe him? He then changed his mind, and basically invented a scenario which was outside of the rules and the worst possible one for Mercedes

Also massively doubt anyone would be going mental to end on a safety car, it’s normal to end on a safety car, again another weird statement from someone who’s trying to gatekeep others out of the sport. It would have been uncontroversial to anyone who wasn’t red bull but even red bull would have begrudgingly accepted it, they knew they lost on the day.

This will go to court and I can’t see how the FIA have a leg to stand on. I don’t think the result should be changed but the FIA need to be taken to task. All season they’ve shown terrible officiating and have frustrated both teams, clearly their system can’t handle a competitive season. With the new regs next season it will potentially be even more competitive so this problem will get worse. I think one simple change could be not to have one race director, but a team, Charlie Whiting had someone with him to bounce ideas off and was much more effective.
 
Such a dumb take to avoid stating the obvious, that the rules were broken to change how a F1 race works, meaning that Mercedes didn’t have “numerous chances” to change their tires. If you knew the sport you’d know this but instead you’re the one pretending to know the sport and gatekeep others out.

Mercedes were 100% on the right strategy, they could have changed during the first VSC, however they got that call right and Lewis had a 11second lead with a few laps to go.

There was then a second safety car, which if normal rules were followed would have lead to two differenct scenarios, either cars don’t unlap, and you have a race for a couple laps but Max has to fight through some cars. Or you let them unlap and all cars unlap and the safety car is withdrawn, this would have lasted until the end of the race and Lewis would have won under safety car conditions.

As you should know in the history of F1, it’s never been a case that you can just let a few cars unlap themselves. Your argument is basically that Mercedes got their strategy wrong, when actually their strategy was right, until the race director arbitrarily changed the rules until the strategy was wrong. How can you strategise for a competition of the rules and common understanding of them can be changed on one man’s whim? How could have Mercedes accounted for something that has literally never happened, and is not within the scope of the rules? Not to mention the race director explicitly told Mercedes he’d decided to go for the no unlapping route, were they supposed to just not believe him? He then changed his mind, and basically invented a scenario which was outside of the rules and the worst possible one for Mercedes

Also massively doubt anyone would be going mental to end on a safety car, it’s normal to end on a safety car, again another weird statement from someone who’s trying to gatekeep others out of the sport. It would have been uncontroversial to anyone who wasn’t red bull but even red bull would have begrudgingly accepted it, they knew they lost on the day.

This will go to court and I can’t see how the FIA have a leg to stand on. I don’t think the result should be changed but the FIA need to be taken to task. All season they’ve shown terrible officiating and have frustrated both teams, clearly their system can’t handle a competitive season. With the new regs next season it will potentially be even more competitive so this problem will get worse. I think one simple change could be not to have one race director, but a team, Charlie Whiting had someone with him to bounce ideas off and was much more effective.
I think for the good of the sport two things need to happen 1) Masi sacked as he lacks any authority, this weird bargaining with teams has never happened before and 2) prevent any communication between the RD and teams unless asked for by the RD.

Currently F1 has all the sporting integrity of Strictly Come Dancing. It's supposed to be a sport not a Netflix drama.
 
It's not an accusation of bias, it's an accusation of inconsistencies from one minute to the next.

Mercedes did the right thing staying out unfer the normal SC rules. The rules weren't adhered to though there's no argument about that surely?

I know youre playing devil's advocate but as an F1 geek you can't be happy with artificially manufacturing a result?
It wasn't artificially manufacturing a result in my eyes. One driver took a risk, it paid off. Happens all year long.

The unfortunate thing is both deserved the Championship.
 
Such a dumb take to avoid stating the obvious, that the rules were broken to change how a F1 race works, meaning that Mercedes didn’t have “numerous chances” to change their tires. If you knew the sport you’d know this but instead you’re the one pretending to know the sport and gatekeep others out.

Mercedes were 100% on the right strategy, they could have changed during the first VSC, however they got that call right and Lewis had a 11second lead with a few laps to go.

There was then a second safety car, which if normal rules were followed would have lead to two differenct scenarios, either cars don’t unlap, and you have a race for a couple laps but Max has to fight through some cars. Or you let them unlap and all cars unlap and the safety car is withdrawn, this would have lasted until the end of the race and Lewis would have won under safety car conditions.

As you should know in the history of F1, it’s never been a case that you can just let a few cars unlap themselves. Your argument is basically that Mercedes got their strategy wrong, when actually their strategy was right, until the race director arbitrarily changed the rules until the strategy was wrong. How can you strategise for a competition of the rules and common understanding of them can be changed on one man’s whim? How could have Mercedes accounted for something that has literally never happened, and is not within the scope of the rules? Not to mention the race director explicitly told Mercedes he’d decided to go for the no unlapping route, were they supposed to just not believe him? He then changed his mind, and basically invented a scenario which was outside of the rules and the worst possible one for Mercedes

Also massively doubt anyone would be going mental to end on a safety car, it’s normal to end on a safety car, again another weird statement from someone who’s trying to gatekeep others out of the sport. It would have been uncontroversial to anyone who wasn’t red bull but even red bull would have begrudgingly accepted it, they knew they lost on the day.

This will go to court and I can’t see how the FIA have a leg to stand on. I don’t think the result should be changed but the FIA need to be taken to task. All season they’ve shown terrible officiating and have frustrated both teams, clearly their system can’t handle a competitive season. With the new regs next season it will potentially be even more competitive so this problem will get worse. I think one simple change could be not to have one race director, but a team, Charlie Whiting had someone with him to bounce ideas off and was much more effective.
Only a dumb take because you don't like it. Soon as you use that stance, waste of time talking to you. I'd have bothered to reply without that start tbh. I do know and it's clear a vast majority have never watched F1 with the amount of outrage! OMG a crash and someone has lost out because of it. It. Happens. All the time.
 
I think for the good of the sport two things need to happen 1) Masi sacked as he lacks any authority, this weird bargaining with teams has never happened before and 2) prevent any communication between the RD and teams unless asked for by the RD.

Currently F1 has all the sporting integrity of Strictly Come Dancing. It's supposed to be a sport not a Netflix drama.
Agree with that - I think they also need to look at pitting under safety car/ virtual car. In a sport of fine margins, it's ludicrous that cars can lose the pain staking advantage they may have built up lap by lap over some twist of luck through accidents by others and then what happens because of that.
 
I think for the good of the sport two things need to happen 1) Masi sacked as he lacks any authority, this weird bargaining with teams has never happened before and 2) prevent any communication between the RD and teams unless asked for by the RD.

Currently F1 has all the sporting integrity of Strictly Come Dancing. It's supposed to be a sport not a Netflix drama.
I think the rules on safety cars need reviewing. It is not just this race where a seemingly unassailable lead has been wiped out. It was only a few races ago that Hamilton had just passed the pit entry when the safety car or virtual safety car was deployed and subsequently he was put at a tremendous disadvantage.
Also Street circuits which become a driver procession as overtakes are almost impossible do the sport no favours
 
I think the rules on safety cars need reviewing. It is not just this race where a seemingly unassailable lead has been wiped out. It was only a few races ago that Hamilton had just passed the pit entry when the safety car or virtual safety car was deployed and subsequently he was put at a tremendous disadvantage.
Also Street circuits which become a driver procession as overtakes are almost impossible do the sport no favours
I'm not sure what the answer to the SC is, maintaining gaps would be almost impossible?
 
It wasn't artificially manufacturing a result in my eyes. One driver took a risk, it paid off. Happens all year long.

The unfortunate thing is both deserved the Championship.
It was though, because it was the decider, Masi finished them behind the SC in Bahrain last year but the championship was done.
 
Only a dumb take because you don't like it. Soon as you use that stance, waste of time talking to you. I'd have bothered to reply without that start tbh. I do know and it's clear a vast majority have never watched F1 with the amount of outrage! OMG a crash and someone has lost out because of it. It. Happens. All the time.
You won’t engage because you’re wrong. If you can’t handle your views being scrutinised don’t post them on a forum. It’s, to me, a dumb take so I will call it that. You were just posting to make yourself feel better than other people who were new to the sport but your own views don’t stand up to scrutiny or are not consistent with an understanding of the sport.

Again the issue isn’t the crash, as you should well know. I’ve already explained the issue but obviously you’re more interested in avoiding it, as I said previously.
 
F1 needs to review a lot of the rules or at the very least clarify them. As for race director, Masi needs sacking and replacing with someone who is far stricter. The 2 codes they need to stick to are safety and fairness. As for the bargaining, make it a 1 way comms to the teams, RD reviews, makes a decision and relays it. Any challenge can follow the post race appeal process.
 
Don’t they already manage that with the VSC?
(Genuine question)
Yeah but you can't control where cars are on track with a VSC. The idea of bunching them up is so areas of the track are safe to work on with no cars coming past for a time.
 
Race director needs be left alone during races. Masi was flapping when Toto was asking him about what was going on. New race director also needed. I'd bring back pit board only comms to the driver too. And gravel traps - that would solve the issue of going hot into a corner and knowing you've run off and no comeback if it doesn't stick.
 
Race director needs be left alone during races. Masi was flapping when Toto was asking him about what was going on. New race director also needed. I'd bring back pit board only comms to the driver too. And gravel traps - that would solve the issue of going hot into a corner and knowing you've run off and no comeback if it doesn't stick.
Or as Brundle and Niko said, virtual gravel traps, whereby the engine is cut or limited for 2secs if a driver goes off the track. It would stop Max doing his mad lunges, but would also impact the drivers he forces wide, hmm, really not an easy one to solve.
 
You won’t engage because you’re wrong. If you can’t handle your views being scrutinised don’t post them on a forum. It’s, to me, a dumb take so I will call it that. You were just posting to make yourself feel better than other people who were new to the sport but your own views don’t stand up to scrutiny or are not consistent with an understanding of the sport.

Again the issue isn’t the crash, as you should well know. I’ve already explained the issue but obviously you’re more interested in avoiding it, as I said previously.
I'm not wrong though am I? Because what I've said happened is factually true. You just can't handle it because you're too upset your mate didn't win.

Lots of words, lots of paragraphs but actual little substance. Try another sport, like Tennis, it's a bit easier to understand. Could work for you.
 
F1 needs to review a lot of the rules or at the very least clarify them. As for race director, Masi needs sacking and replacing with someone who is far stricter. The 2 codes they need to stick to are safety and fairness. As for the bargaining, make it a 1 way comms to the teams, RD reviews, makes a decision and relays it. Any challenge can follow the post race appeal process.
Do they? The sport is the most popular it's ever been at this current time. There's clearly a reason for it?
 
Seemed pretty fine to me, track is clear and it's near the last lap. Why wait for another 5/6 cars to go through when you could let people race? It's a race after all, not a follow the safety car round for 6 laps.

He had a pretty impossible job. And I imagine had about 50000 things going on at once. With both Mercedes and Red Bull trying to influence him, which they shouldn't do.

I actually think they shouldn't be able to speak to FIA at all during the race. Only post race.
I think your last point is a very good one. Just interested in your views on a few other points..

Do you think it right that the race director is the ultimate arbiter of what happens in a race, and seems to be able to overrule what the rule books say as seems to be the argument for rejecting Mercedes’ 2nd appeal.

Do you think it what has happened over the past couple of weeks has been good for F1 or embarrassing? Re last week I’m thinking of the mistake in no one bothering to tell Hamilton that Max was going to let him through which is quite dangerous if you think about it?

A few of your comments have been about both drivers having luck at various times in the season. Some elements of luck are clearly unavoidable eg when it rains and some teams have pitted for tyres and have to again whilst others haven’t, but there are ways to cut out some elements of luck. E.g no pitting under a safety car which would prevent the lottery of some drivers being able to pit whilst others can’t because of their track position. Also in some motorsports if there are long delays due to a crash then the race is treated as to halves with aggregate time being factored in - do you think this would be fairer.

Finally did the fact that there was one lap of racing at the end yesterday make the finish more exciting for you when like is would imagine most ardent F1 watchers you new with his fresh tyres, barring a massive mistake Max was always going to be able to overtake Lewis.
 
I think your last point is a very good one. Just interested in your views on a few other points..

Do you think it right that the race director is the ultimate arbiter of what happens in a race, and seems to be able to overrule what the rule books say as seems to be the argument for rejecting Mercedes’ 2nd appeal.

Do you think it what has happened over the past couple of weeks has been good for F1 or embarrassing? Re last week I’m thinking of the mistake in no one bothering to tell Hamilton that Max was going to let him through which is quite dangerous if you think about it?

A few of your comments have been about both drivers having luck at various times in the season. Some elements of luck are clearly unavoidable eg when it rains and some teams have pitted for tyres and have to again whilst others haven’t, but there are ways to cut out some elements of luck. E.g no pitting under a safety car which would prevent the lottery of some drivers being able to pit whilst others can’t because of their track position. Also in some motorsports if there are long delays due to a crash then the race is treated as to halves with aggregate time being factored in - do you think this would be fairer.

Finally did the fact that there was one lap of racing at the end yesterday make the finish more exciting for you when like is would imagine most ardent F1 watchers you new with his fresh tyres, barring a massive mistake Max was always going to be able to overtake Lewis.
Ah a decent post, finally, not waffle.

1) I think there has to be some sort of way of handling a race, similar to a referee and VAR? I think it's fine as it is. There will always be a loser and a winner with decisions. I think people are under-estimating the amount of noise and things going on during that time. The pressure to get it right, within 3 or 4 minutes. Is the area clear? Is there damage to the barriers? What's the current car line up? I think the unfortunate thing was there wasn't 4 or 5 more laps as we wouldn't be discussing it. I think they didn't let through 7-10 cars? Maybe less?

2) No, it was pretty pathetic and avoidable, especially the incident you mentioned. Both have been at fault for various issues over the season. But it's brought huge viewership to the sport?

3) No. There's a reason why F1 is so popular and majority of others aren't globally.

4) Lewis had the ability to make a pit stop too. Plenty of chance actually but understandably he didn't and his gamble this time didn't pay off. Mercedes have made some bloody terrible calls this year. This was far harder to make with what was on the line.
 
Also, final comment on this thread, if you want this to go to court and to be over turned. That's the death of sport. It lives on drama and excitement, controversy. That's why we watch it.

Max over the course of the season put his name into the hat to become world Champion. He didn't just get it just based off of one moment.
 
Only a dumb take because you don't like it. Soon as you use that stance, waste of time talking to you. I'd have bothered to reply without that start tbh. I do know and it's clear a vast majority have never watched F1 with the amount of outrage! OMG a crash and someone has lost out because of it. It. Happens. All the time.
Kurt

Allow me to say it. You are a knob. You say it's a waste of time talking to another poster yet you are the one who started the inflammatory remarks against many others on this thread. You've not provided a shred of evidence to counter all the inconsistencies and changes to the rules and protoco; that has happened in all previous races. It' s not about Hamilton v Verstappen because Verstappen did nothing wrong. It's Masi who fucked up. One other point, Hamilton had everything to lose, Verstappen nothing. So if Hamilton had pitted and Verstappen stayed out with just the one lap remaining then it's in Verstappens interests to engineer an incident to take Hamilton or both of them out. And the odds would have been pretty short that that would have happened.
 
Last edited:
Do they? The sport is the most popular it's ever been at this current time. There's clearly a reason for it?
Well that is simply not true, the latest available viewing figures show they dropped by 8%. As for reviewing the rules, yes, they 100% need to look at them or at least how they communicate them within a race situation, yesterday was not good for the sport in the long term. If the FIA can't officiate the sport properly it will damage the brand further.
 
Well that is simply not true, the latest available viewing figures show they dropped by 8%. As for reviewing the rules, yes, they 100% need to look at them or at least how they communicate them within a race situation, yesterday was not good for the sport in the long term. If the FIA can't officiate the sport properly it will damage the brand further.
Agreed - don't forget the balls up with comms the previous week when again the race director was too slow telling Mercedes that Max was giving the place back.
By Kurt's logic, no rules ever need looking at if the popularity of a sport increases🙄
 
I'm not wrong though am I? Because what I've said happened is factually true. You just can't handle it because you're too upset your mate didn't win.

Lots of words, lots of paragraphs but actual little substance. Try another sport, like Tennis, it's a bit easier to understand. Could work for you.

"Because what I've said happened is factually true" what? You're not even making coherent sense. Your dumb take was "Mercedes had every opportunity to pit" I've showed why, anyone who knows anything about F1, would know that not to be true. Strange you would say there's little substance, but you seem to be incapable of enaging with any of it, it should be easy. You've just continually stuck your fingers in your ears and gone "nah nah nah I'm not listening!". Why even post on a forum at all if you're not going to engage with the points made against you? Or am I in the wrong place, is this just your soapbox?

Love how you're continuing to be condescending whilst avoiding any of the points I've made which are factually true. You have no interest in actual discussion and just putting other people down and making yourself feel better. Strange, there are much more productive and positive ways to do that.

F1 could learn a lot from Tennis I will give you that.
 
Last edited:
One other key point which Kurt conveniently overlooks is that the cars pitted including Verstappen before the decision to allow just a few cars to unlap themselves was made. How on earth was Hamilton going to know that Masi would completely re-write the rules to what has happened in every other race when a safety car has been deployed?.
 
Sounds like Mercedes have scrapped the formal appeal to save the integrity of the Sport .
LH repeatedly asked Wolff not to appeal.
 
If they ended it under the safety car, people would be going mental
Really, why?

Hamilton was deservedly in the lead, and under 'normal' circumstances how on earth would Verstappen had been able to make up 11 seconds in one lap.

Were not talking one race, were talking about the culmination of a season of races and a World Champion decider. The rules should have been adhered to as per letter, not on the whim of a relatively inexperienced individual who by general consensus fecked up.
 
Last edited:
To me the key questions/points are:

1. Why would Mercedes take a risk when they were leading and if the rules were followed would have won? Can anyone answer this because them not taking a risk by changing tyres seems to be a criticism that is being thrown at them. Why would they? Anyone?

2. How can a team strategise for a race if they don't know whether the rules will be followed? How would a manager set up his team on a football pitch if he doesn't know whether the offside rule will apply?

As I've said earlier, ultimately they wanted a spectacle because they knew a lot of people were watching, and in the end because of the crash they decided to sacrifice the integrity of the race for it.

I will add that the way LH has reacted has been top notch, he's gone up massively in my estimation. Max too should enjoy his title and celebrations, as he did nothing wrong either. The FIA has let him down too as his first world title shouldn't have been marred by such controversy.
 
Funny how for the rest of the season there was about 4 of us posting about F1.

All of a sudden everyone is an expert in every aspect of the sport.
 
Even though it's a huge injustice and the most corrupt thing I've ever seen happen in a sport with my own eyes, I don't think Mercedes have a leg to stand on in court. I'm sure that one of the regulations allows the race director to make an 'on the fly' decision of they deem it to benefit the race.

After 15 years of following the sport, I don't think I'll bother next year.
 
If they ended it under the safety car, people would be going mental.
Why? The final race and the championship has been decided in the past under the safety car yet people didn't go mental.

The rules are in place and one of those rules states that the safety car can come in and the race proceed one lap after those who were lapped unlapping themselves and the track has been cleared of any debrie. This rule was broken yesterday giving Max a massive advantage. Regarding tyre changes Max had nothing to lose whilst Hamilton did given he was 11 or 12 seconds in front and may have come out behind Max as he had no idea how long the yellow flags and safety car would be out for. With no accident Hamilton would have won the race easily but end of the day Max won it and therefore the F1 Championship.
 
Irrespective of what went on it was a brilliant overtaking manoeuvre Verstappen pulled off to pass Hamilton on that final lap though he seems to be getting little credit for it because he shouldn't have been there.
 
Irrespective of what went on it was a brilliant overtaking manoeuvre Verstappen pulled off to pass Hamilton on that final lap though he seems to be getting little credit for it because he shouldn't have been there.
It was a fantastic move and with nothing to lose, I'd expect nothing less from Max. However I do feel it was reckless to make the move there when he had the straight coming up soon after.
 
Irrespective of what went on it was a brilliant overtaking manoeuvre Verstappen pulled off to pass Hamilton on that final lap though he seems to be getting little credit for it because he shouldn't have been there.
Lewis was a sitting duck, whether that corner or the straight, there was only ever one winner once the race director cleared the way for Max. I don't mind Max's style, he can be a little reckless bordering on dangerous but that is what has made this season as watchable as it has been.
 
Back
Top