Its about time our government did something

Simple: the chant can be interpreted either as the Palestinians having their own country ( which is possible together with an Israeli state ) or a call for the complete destruction of Israel. I don't agree with the second. I'm simply saying there are 2 possible and accepted interpretations, that's all.

Do you think the Palestinian people have as much right to their own free country as the Israelis do? Because I do. I am against violence of any description, especially against innocent people, it's abhorrent and inhuman.

Just one more point about the term " terrorists". You may remember Menachim Begin who became Israeli PM, and a respected one. He ( and others) was proscribed as a terrorist by the British Government while fighting for independence for Israel. One man's terrorist is another man's freedom fighter. 'Twas ever thus and probably always will be.
I abhor violence wherever it comes from.
sorry but I don't buy into that one bit. Think you're in denial. The reason it's currently come to the fore is because of the situation now in Israel/Gaza.

And yes the Palestinians have as much right to their own country. I've already said that in this thread. The question is where because the nation of Israel already exists.

Remainder removed, offensive content.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Simple: the chant can be interpreted either as the Palestinians having their own country ( which is possible together with an Israeli state ) or a call for the complete destruction of Israel. I don't agree with the second. I'm simply saying there are 2 possible and accepted interpretations, that's all.

Do you think the Palestinian people have as much right to their own free country as the Israelis do? Because I do. I am against violence of any description, especially against innocent people, it's abhorrent and inhuman.

Just one more point about the term " terrorists". You may remember Menachim Begin who became Israeli PM, and a respected one. He ( and others) was proscribed as a terrorist by the British Government while fighting for independence for Israel. One man's terrorist is another man's freedom fighter. 'Twas ever thus and probably always will be.
I abhor violence wherever it comes from.
It can't be interpreted any other way at all

Only an idiot or a terrorist sympathiser would think that
 
sorry but I don't buy into that one bit. Think you're in denial. The reason it's currently come to the fore is because of the situation now in Israel/Gaza.

And yes the Palestinians have as much right to their own country. I've already said that in this thread. The question is where because the nation of Israel already exists.

Remainder removed, offensive content.
No denial from me. So it's an intractable situation, is that what you're saying? It will always be like this?
I don't know what the offensive content was but there's no need for it.
 
No denial from me. So it's an intractable situation, is that what you're saying? It will always be like this?
I don't know what the offensive content was but there's no need for it.

Just total nonsense from the mods but not for the first time. Their bias once again clearly coming thru with not a clue about impartiality. The remainder of my post removed was questioning the classification of your use of the term "freedom fighters" and if some of the atrocities committed which i named were in the name of freedom!

As for a solution, well I don't know what the answer is or how to find a solution. A two state solution seems obvious but as i've said Israel is already there so will the Palestinians be willing to move somewhere whey can govern themselves and have the freedom they deserve? I doubt it. There are far greater minds and more knowledgeable people than me. But none of them are on here although some like to think they are.
 
Last edited:
It's about time our Government did something about:

Inflation
Interest Rates
Mending the NHS
Building lots more affordable houses
Etc
Etc

But we all know they won't.
Roll on the end of next year when these crooks are ousted.
 
I´m not ignoring it. Anyway, from the river to the sea is what Netanyahu envisages for Israel, as shown on his map of the `` new`` Middle East.
So, what do you think "Khaybar, Khaybar, Ya Yahud, jaish Muhammad soufa ya’ou (Khaybar Khaybar oh Jews, the army of Muhammad will return)" means?
 
Who wouldn’t be after the massacres on 7th October?
Two points.

The land grab by extremist settlers was going on well before 7th October.

The 7th October atrocities were committed by Hamas coming out of Gaza. The land grab currently being discussed is occurring in the West Bank where Hamas have no influence at all.
 
Just total nonsense from the mods but not for the first time. Their bias once again clearly coming thru with not a clue about impartiality. The remainder of my post removed was questioning the classification of your use of the term "freedom fighters" and if some of the atrocities committed which i named were in the name of freedom!

As for a solution, well I don't know what the answer is or how to find a solution. A two state solution seems obvious but as i've said Israel is already there so will the Palestinians be willing to move somewhere whey can govern themselves and have the freedom they deserve? I doubt it. There are far greater minds and more knowledgeable people than me. But none of them are on here although some like to think they are.
Yep I've had multiple posts removed on this subject

Wouldn't surprise me if that drunken terrorist apologist Mexboro was a moderator as it always appears that the posts get removed when he's on the thread

About time we knew who the moderation team were, I have no idea why this doesn't happen

When i moderated this board I didn't hide it, neither did Robbie or MAC for that matter

Cowards .......
 
Two points.

The land grab by extremist settlers was going on well before 7th October.

The 7th October atrocities were committed by Hamas coming out of Gaza. The land grab currently being discussed is occurring in the West Bank where Hamas have no influence at all.
I was replying to a comment made why the Israeli government is hell bent on eradicating Hamas that’s all.

We all know the history and the land grabbing as it’s been done to death on here already.
 
Last edited:
Yep I've had multiple posts removed on this subject

Wouldn't surprise me if that drunken terrorist apologist Mexboro was a moderator as it always appears that the posts get removed when he's on the thread

About time we knew who the moderation team were, I have no idea why this doesn't happen

When i moderated this board I didn't hide it, neither did Robbie or MAC for that matter

Cowards .......
I’m not a moderator.

I’m also not a terrorist apologist.

I am occasionally drunk.
 
Just total nonsense from the mods but not for the first time. Their bias once again clearly coming thru with not a clue about impartiality. The remainder of my post removed was questioning the classification of your use of the term "freedom fighters" and if some of the atrocities committed which i named were in the name of freedom!

As for a solution, well I don't know what the answer is or how to find a solution. A two state solution seems obvious but as i've said Israel is already there so will the Palestinians be willing to move somewhere whey can govern themselves and have the freedom they deserve? I doubt it. There are far greater minds and more knowledgeable people than me. But none of them are on here although some like to think they are.
Thanks for your reply. Sorry about the slight delay in replying. With regard to " Freedom fighters ": the history of independence struggles is littered with examples of people designated terrorists who committed atrocities but who subsequently became heroes. I gave the example of Menachem Begin , who contributed to the slaughter of both British troops and Arabs. I shouldn't need to repeat it but I abhor violence, I abhor what Hamas did on 7th October. I abhor the Israeli Defence Force killing innocent men, women and children. I abhor the utter disregard for rights on all sides ( including the West Bank, where Israeli settlers act with impunity, taking land that is not theirs, disposessing and murdering innocent Palestinians in the process. I abhor it all.
 
So, what do you think "Khaybar, Khaybar, Ya Yahud, jaish Muhammad soufa ya’ou (Khaybar Khaybar oh Jews, the army of Muhammad will return)" means?
Not sure how to answer that, tbh. What I think is, based on Netanyahu's speech, with map, there will be no Palestinian territories. I support Israel's right to exist, just as I support the Palestinians' right to have their own independent country.
 
Thanks for your reply. Sorry about the slight delay in replying. With regard to " Freedom fighters ": the history of independence struggles is littered with examples of people designated terrorists who committed atrocities but who subsequently became heroes. I gave the example of Menachem Begin , who contributed to the slaughter of both British troops and Arabs. I shouldn't need to repeat it but I abhor violence, I abhor what Hamas did on 7th October. I abhor the Israeli Defence Force killing innocent men, women and children. I abhor the utter disregard for rights on all sides ( including the West Bank, where Israeli settlers act with impunity, taking land that is not theirs, disposessing and murdering innocent Palestinians in the process. I abhor it all.

Not directly about the thread but it shows what's going on in the West Bank. Shocking.
 
Not sure how to answer that, tbh. What I think is, based on Netanyahu's speech, with map, there will be no Palestinian territories. I support Israel's right to exist, just as I support the Palestinians' right to have their own independent country.
Let me answer it for you then, it's a reference to a 7th century battle fought by Mohammed, which ultimately resulted in the expulsion of all Jews from Palestine, so what it means is "dear Jews, remember the last time we killed or exiled all of you, we hope to do so again, real soon".
 
Let me answer it for you then, it's a reference to a 7th century battle fought by Mohammed, which ultimately resulted in the expulsion of all Jews from Palestine, so what it means is "dear Jews, remember the last time we killed or exiled all of you, we hope to do so again, real soon".
Maybe we should ban the Scottish National Anthem and some of the latter verses of the British one aswell if we don't want anybody singing about historical battles and the defeat of their neighbours.
 
Maybe we should ban the Scottish National Anthem and some of the latter verses of the British one aswell if we don't want anybody singing about historical battles and the defeat of their neighbours.
Bit different to be fair pal

Not sure Scotland as a nation are calling for the whole of England to be wiped out
 
Personally speaking , I don’t give a monkeys about what goes on inner London, as they don’t give a monkeys about anything North of the Watford gap.
 
So, what do you think "Khaybar, Khaybar, Ya Yahud, jaish Muhammad soufa ya’ou (Khaybar Khaybar oh Jews, the army of Muhammad will return)" means?
It's a total mess with no end in sight. I am for a free Israel and a free Palestine, which all Palestinians can call their home and be free. Same for Israelis, although they have theirs.
 
Yep I've had multiple posts removed on this subject

Wouldn't surprise me if that drunken terrorist apologist Mexboro was a moderator as it always appears that the posts get removed when he's on the thread

About time we knew who the moderation team were, I have no idea why this doesn't happen

When i moderated this board I didn't hide it, neither did Robbie or MAC for that matter

Cowards .......

Wish I bloody had hidden it. You need thick skin to do that and be known as you can never win.
 
It's a total mess with no end in sight. I am for a free Israel and a free Palestine, which all Palestinians can call their home and be free. Same for Israelis, although they have theirs.
Can you define the geographical area that "free Palestine" would cover?

Also, are you willing to accept that at least some of those chanting "from the river to the sea" are calling for the destruction of Israel.
 
Actually although Suella Braverman claimed the chant “From the river to the sea Palestine will be free” was a hate crime the Met Police, after taking legal advice, decided it wasn’t, unless it was targeted at specific individuals or sung outside a synagogue. So unless that happened no crime was committed and it wasn’t illegal.

That said I agree with you to an extent and can see why people could regard it as a call for the destruction of Israel. And the end of the day though it’s only words. Meanwhile the ground invasion of Gaza has started and the civilian casualties are mounting. That’s why the protesters were calling for a ceasefire. They weren’t actually calling for the end of Israel.
You are so incredibly capable of deluding yourself
 
About all these protests on the streets of London spreading hate in our capital city

Every weekend since October 7th it's been gong on

Get the troops on the streets and disperse these terrorist sympathisers before it really kicks off

Well done to the football lads defending the Cenotaph btw
You could always write to your MP...or just sound off on here. Whichever gives you the greater satisfaction.
 
Can you define the geographical area that "free Palestine" would cover?

Also, are you willing to accept that at least some of those chanting "from the river to the sea" are calling for the destruction of Israel.
It's not for me to define. I assumed you would realise that. That's a silly question.
What do you think should happen to the Palestinian people? Do you think they deserve a country they can legitimately call their own, their home? They were and still are the dispossessed. They were and still are the oppressed. What should happen to them? Do they not deserve the same as Israel? I think they do. Both Israelis and Palestinians deserve it but Israel will never agree to it. So maybe you should ask your question to Netanyahu. Good luck with that one.
I've already said
 
It's not for me to define. I assumed you would realise that. That's a silly question.
It seems a pretty simple question, if you're calling for a free Palestine, then surely you should know what you mean by Palestine.

The options include, but are not limited to:
  1. "from the river to the sea";
  2. the original 1948 borders;
  3. the 1966 borders;
  4. the current borders;
and when posters refuse to say what they really mean by free Palestine, I tend to assume they are thinking about option 1.


What do you think should happen to the Palestinian people? Do you think they deserve a country they can legitimately call their own, their home? They were and still are the dispossessed. They were and still are the oppressed. What should happen to them? Do they not deserve the same as Israel? I think they do. Both Israelis and Palestinians deserve it but Israel will never agree to it.
Unfortunately, the Palestinian people have just unambiguously demonstrated what a "free Palestine" would look like, i.e. a terrorist state that exists solely to launch attacks against Israel, with the objective of killing as many Israelis as possible, so post 7/10, any chance of such a state is now off the table permanently.

Even if by some miracle such a two-state solution could be negotiated, it would only be a matter of time before another 7/10 or similar atrocity caused the solution to collapse, so we'd be back to where we are today.

I'm sorry, the situation is now unsolvable, if they want a country of their own it'll have to be somewhere far enough away from Palestine that they are no longer a threat, maybe we should grab a chunk of Iran and set one up for them there as reparations for their role in 7/10.
 
It seems a pretty simple question, if you're calling for a free Palestine, then surely you should know what you mean by Palestine.

The options include, but are not limited to:
  1. "from the river to the sea";
  2. the original 1948 borders;
  3. the 1966 borders;
  4. the current borders;
and when posters refuse to say what they really mean by free Palestine, I tend to assume they are thinking about option 1.



Unfortunately, the Palestinian people have just unambiguously demonstrated what a "free Palestine" would look like, i.e. a terrorist state that exists solely to launch attacks against Israel, with the objective of killing as many Israelis as possible, so post 7/10, any chance of such a state is now off the table permanently.

Even if by some miracle such a two-state solution could be negotiated, it would only be a matter of time before another 7/10 or similar atrocity caused the solution to collapse, so we'd be back to where we are today.

I'm sorry, the situation is now unsolvable, if they want a country of their own it'll have to be somewhere far enough away from Palestine that they are no longer a threat, maybe we should grab a chunk of Iran and set one up for them there as reparations for their role in 7/10.
No they haven't! Your first sentence is total, utter ignorance. There are more than 2 MILLION people, mostly poor and living in squalor, in Gaza alone. The West Bank is an absolute inhuman disgrace on the part of Israel. Please! "If they want a country of their own"... They were and still are dispossessed. They were thrown out of their own land. It's still happening in the West Bank.

I give up.
 
No they haven't! Your first sentence is total, utter ignorance. There are more than 2 MILLION people, mostly poor and living in squalor, in Gaza alone. The West Bank is an absolute inhuman disgrace on the part of Israel. Please! "If they want a country of their own"... They were and still are dispossessed. They were thrown out of their own land. It's still happening in the West Bank.

I give up.
Like it or not, Hamas were elected to form the government in 2006, the fact that they were able to seize power absolutely in 2007 stems from this fact, they are the official voice of the people of Gaza.

In any event, the semantics of whether it was Hamas or the people of Palestine who spoke on 7/10, do not change the material facts, there is no way a viable Palestinian state can be established without it posing an unacceptable security risk to Israel, Hamas has just hammered the final nail into the coffin of the two-state solution.

Oh, and in common with others calling for a "free Palestine", you also refuse to explain what you actually mean by Palestine.
 
Like it or not, Hamas were elected to form the government in 2006, the fact that they were able to seize power absolutely in 2007 stems from this fact, they are the official voice of the people of Gaza.

In any event, the semantics of whether it was Hamas or the people of Palestine who spoke on 7/10, do not change the material facts, there is no way a viable Palestinian state can be established without it posing an unacceptable security risk to Israel, Hamas has just hammered the final nail into the coffin of the two-state solution.

Oh, and in common with others calling for a "free Palestine", you also refuse to explain what you actually mean by Palestine.
They dont know and they never will

If it wasn't such a disaster it would be laughable reading the shite on this board
 
They dont know and they never will

If it wasn't such a disaster it would be laughable reading the shite on this board
Yep, it's strange, isn't it, they're calling for a "free Palestine" apparently without the faintest idea of what a "free Palestine" might be, let alone how it might be made to work without being an intolerable security risk to Israel.

I can only try to encourage them to think, but that only seems to make them angry.
 
Yep, it's strange, isn't it, they're calling for a "free Palestine" apparently without the faintest idea of what a "free Palestine" might be, let alone how it might be made to work without being an intolerable security risk to Israel.

I can only try to encourage them to think, but that only seems to make them angry.
I honestly struggle with how intolerant the left our on this board

Its like it's their way and nothing else matters and anything else is just wrong

it really is bizarre how un liberal the liberals our
 
And I find it astonishing how a fair few people are completely self-unaware, or is that unself-aware? They have not an inkling of how they appear to others.
 
Last edited:
And I find it astonishing how a fair few people are completely self-unaware, or is that unself-aware? They have not an inkling of how they appear to others.
I agree.

Some posters seem to think that calling for cities to be “flattened” and thousands of innocent people (including children) to be killed, starved and terrorised, in pursuit of their objective, is a perfectly reasonable position to adopt.

And unless they have a blueprint that’s guaranteed to defeat Hamas and achieve peace in the region, a challenge that’s defeated the finest minds for decades, then posters are not allowed to point out how wrong this policy is and call for a ceasefire. In fact if a poster dares to point that out and call for a ceasefire, then they are called a **/scum/ and/or a terrorist sympathiser. Or even worse “unliberal”.

Perfectly reasonable of course. In some minds at least.
 
I agree.

Some posters seem to think that calling for cities to be “flattened” and thousands of innocent people (including children) to be killed, starved and terrorised, in pursuit of their objective, is a perfectly reasonable position to adopt.

And unless they have a blueprint that’s guaranteed to defeat Hamas and achieve peace in the region, a challenge that’s defeated the finest minds for decades, then posters are not allowed to point out how wrong this policy is and call for a ceasefire. In fact if a poster dares to point that out and call for a ceasefire, then they are called a **/scum/ and/or a terrorist sympathiser. Or even worse “unliberal”.

Perfectly reasonable of course. In some minds at least.
what does a ceasefire achieve? Is it reasonable to think it includes allowing Hamas to regroup, to perhaps take supplies meant for everybody rather than just those who are digging in preparing for a fight. Israel know that. Is it reasonable to think Hamas are using innocent Palestinians as a human shield yet the consensus on here seems to fail to realise that and solely blaming Israel. Israel are fighting a war because of the actions of Hamas on 7/10. That's the stark reality.

No matter what you think, it's simply just not as simple as you would like to believe.
 
Back
Top