It's not for you decide whether it is right or not.
To be honest (personally) the last thing that I’d be interested in is leaving it to the judicial system. Far better that he’s judged in the court of public opinion and hopefully given a regular kicking.
I agree. And he would have expensive lawyers to bury the evidence to prevent it from getting in the public domain to show what a scumbag he is
No I didn't .... You have taken a sentence out of context from the comment that I was responding to and without the context of the preceding sentence and then you have attached your own meaning to that sentence and then decided that was my intended meaning.
The current legal system has roots in the Middle Ages and simply doesn't cater for the social media age.
Going to the police wouldn't work in many cases, as seen in yesterday's story about Charing Cross station, where there was and maybe still is, a culture of misogyny, racism and homophobia. Sometimes you don't have another option.
It seems my more forthright comment has been moderated unfortunately...
To be fair, assumptions of guilt historically haven't really needed social media
That's somewhat different though isn't it.... You're looking it from the perspective of a supposed wrongly accused individual...
Well it is as simple as that really isn't it.... As I said, if you are the Victim of the kind of abuse alleged here, then you know exactly what happened... I'm not getting into the kind of Gaslighting that Abusers and Lawyers will adopt to try and convince victims that they can't actually trust their own mind....
But you aren’t talking about the victim taking the law into their own hands, you are talking about family, who presumably weren’t there so don’t know what happened
Yes... Initially I was talking about the Victim and what I would choose to do in similar circumstances... I'm basically saying that as a victim, I would prefer the option of Public shaming and everything that might go with it, to legal procedure.
We’ll have to agree to disagree. Even if you get it right it’s hard to support your loved one after they’ve been a victim of crime if you’re in prison serving 6 years for gbh
There's nothing to disagree about.... Because, it's my choice not yours... I fully appreciate what is right for me, might not be right for you and as I've said, I also acknowledge it might not be the morally or legally correct choice... That doesn't change the fact that it would be the right choice for me.
Bit pompous that Lytham. It’s a matter of huge public interest and a valid topic for debate
But he isn’t middle aged Wiz?
Your post was an absolute disgrace....
Well your previous post was a bit naughty.
I’d accept and understand their motivation.
So you'd actively encourage the police to torture interviewees to extract the truth?
What on earth are you on about…. stop trying to put words into peoples mouths just to create an argument.
I didn't even mention the word "extract", I used the word 'encourage'. I also didn't say that it was OK for families to dish out their own retribution either, in fact I have acknowledged that it isn't OK and recognised that it would be subject to prosecution.
You have already found him guilty. Maybe you could be the hangman of AVFTT.
I'm not sure I have found him guilty though have I!!? What I have said, is that in these types of cases I tend to presume guilt, because that way I'm right in the majority of cases.
People would rather hold on to the idea that she might have staged the whole thing..... It's literally built into our psyche to think in such extreme terms and focus on that as opposed to believing the victim. Let's face it, many of our founding 'patriarchal' belief systems accept that it was OK to beat a 'Bad' Wife and rape within a marriage was only made illegal in the UK in 1994.I‘ve always said ‘if guilty ‘ so no apologies here.
Be very interesting to hear how or why she bust her own lip
Will watch this closely see if any charges come about as let’s not rule that out yet either.
As an individual, I have no need to concern myself with whether something sits within 'the bounds of possibility', I simply rely on probability and what is likely to be the most probable outcome, based on the available information.
As an individual, I have no need to concern myself with whether something sits within 'the bounds of possibility', I simply rely on probability and what is likely to be the most probable outcome, based on the available information.
Feel free to drop the L.A. Lawyer act....
The problem with you hangman, you struggle to abide by the laws of the land. Off with your head the Queen should be saying to you.
I have no problem disagreeing with me, but I do have a big problem with people who presume to tell me what I think or try to twist my words out of context.
