Sending asylum seekers to Rwanda

Unless the white indigenous population start having lots more babies we need more brown people to come here and plug holes in the demographic time bomb. Those brown skinned people can work and pay taxes, so the white indigenous people can retire. Failure to plug this gap means working till the day you die. We also need to keep up with tax revenue to expand on our world beating transport, education and public services.
 
If they stopped the free benefits nhs and housing that would deter the illegals from leaving the safety of France and coming here.The human right lawyers will be making thousands with all the court cases to come.
Maybe stop the benefits for having kids for UK nationals as well then if we're so crowded?
 
If they stopped the free benefits nhs and housing that would deter the illegals from leaving the safety of France and coming here.The human right lawyers will be making thousands with all the court cases to come.
So no one gets any benefits or housing in France? To be honest, they don't here either, as you need two years residence to claim.
 
Unless the white indigenous population start having lots more babies we need more brown people to come here and plug holes in the demographic time bomb. Those brown skinned people can work and pay taxes, so the white indigenous people can retire. Failure to plug this gap means working till the day you die. We also need to keep up with tax revenue to expand on our world beating transport, education and public services.
Takes a racist to bring the colour of someone’s skin into it.
 
£5 million a day to house illegal immigrants in hotels in this country courtesy of the British tax payer. Are we not paying enough already, there’s several threads on here how unhappy everyone is about it. Yet some seem happy to pay more.
 
Perhaps I’am missing something here but would it just not be easier sending them back to France on a one way ticket?
 
schools, hospitals all at breaking point, brilliant let’s just give them all the green belt while we’re at it.
Yet so many of you still vote tory! After more than a.decade of them we don't have enough schools and hospitals, the transport system is 2nd rate and green spaces are being covered in souless housing estates.
Immigrants aren't the major problem, Tory policies are, when will you all wake up.
I'm not saying Labour are the answer either because they are trying to be a watered down Tory party!!
 
While the illegals are waiting to be processed they get free hotels and living allowance costing £4 million pounds a day and counting plus dentists and hospitals
You do know we spend £2 billion a week on pensions? £4 million is chicken feed in the scheme of things.
 
This country is overcrowded, end of.
Perhaps there should be a ban on families having more than one child. We could start with those on benefits then move on to those who don't speak English as a first language. Oops, sorry, you did say 'end of' as in, I refuse to tolerate any further discussion on the matter.
 
The tears from the cheeks of Left Wing Mard Arse's is 4 billion litres a day, so they're in profit.
Don't follow your post Dollar. Possibly because I'm still laughing at the suggestion that the UK has a larger population than Pakistan.
"But it's true I tell her, this bloke down the Dog and Duck says so and he can do quizzes and stuff."
 
Perhaps there should be a ban on families having more than one child. We could start with those on benefits then move on to those who don't speak English as a first language. Oops, sorry, you did say 'end of' as in, I refuse to tolerate any further discussion on the matter.
I’m quite prepared to discuss the matter in a sensible way fy8 refuses to do this as he is just a disagreeable sod who makes statements without any attempt to justify them. I will debate any subject sensibly with any sensible poster, if at the end we both still have opposite views, then so be it we will just agree to disagree.
 
Unless the white indigenous population start having lots more babies we need more brown people to come here and plug holes in the demographic time bomb. Those brown skinned people can work and pay taxes, so the white indigenous people can retire. Failure to plug this gap means working till the day you die. We also need to keep up with tax revenue to expand on our world beating transport, education and public services.
Steady on, they eat their children and things. It's a disgrace. This bloke down the Dog and Duck, well he says....(cont. page 94).
 
£5 million a day to house illegal immigrants in hotels in this country courtesy of the British tax payer. Are we not paying enough already, there’s several threads on here how unhappy everyone is about it. Yet some seem happy to pay more.
We can’t be paying all that money to house and feed them, they aren’t entitled to any benefits.🤣 They must have someone back home sending them money to pay for accommodation and living expenses.🤬
 
You mean Pensioners who have all contributed for decades for a future pension?

Remind me what these people have contributed?

Er nothing.
Just beat me to it Jaffa, I was about to say I worked for 52 years for my pension and didn’t claim a single benefit during that whole time. I think I’m entitled to my pension. If anyone else works and contributes for an equal time they can have the same, and welcome.
 
Just beat me to it Jaffa, I was about to say I worked for 52 years for my pension and didn’t claim a single benefit during that whole time. I think I’m entitled to my pension. If anyone else works and contributes for an equal time they can have the same, and welcome.
Just like people are entitled to benefits - it's the law.
 
They ones who have been convicted in a court of law for so called “honour” killings. And don’t tell me you didn’t know that.
Sorry, you gave me the impression that 'they' meant a particular group in society. You did say 'some of them'. So, I ask again, if you are saying that people who commit honour killings comprise part of a group who should not be entitle to live in this country, what is that group? Who do you mean by 'them.'
Or are you saying that only some of the people who commit honour killings should be kicked out of the country?
 
Sorry, you gave me the impression that 'they' meant a particular group in society. You did say 'some of them'. So, I ask again, if you are saying that people who commit honour killings comprise part of a group who should not be entitle to live in this country, what is that group? Who do you mean by 'them.'
By some of them I meant , as you know, some immigrants, mainly from the sub-continent. That’s not to say some British born haven’t killed children, because we both know they have. It’s more prevalent in the group I have mentioned for religious reasons in a so called peaceful religion.
 
By some of them I meant , as you know, some immigrants, mainly from the sub-continent. That’s not to say some British born haven’t killed children, because we both know they have. It’s more prevalent in the group I have mentioned for religious reasons in a so called peaceful religion.
So, who should not be entitled to live in the UK, people who commit honour killings or people in general from the sub-continent because - in your opinion - as an ethnic group they have a greater proclivity for honour killings than do indigenous citizens of the UK?
 
That is the same thing.
There is a big difference between size and density of population .
So, who should not be entitled to live in the UK, people who commit honour killings or people in general from the sub-continent because - in your opinion - as an ethnic group they have a greater proclivity for honour killings than do indigenous citizens of the UK?
You are just nit picking now. You know that your question doesn’t have an answer, until someone, anyone commits a crime they are all innocent. It’s a matter of record that some people from the group I have mentioned have committed the crime I have mentioned and been convicted of same.
 
Yes there is a difference between size and density of population. However, the expression 'more populated' does not express anything about population density.
 
So the only benefits that should be available are those that are work related, such as Universal Credit. Is that your point?
My point is there are a shole range of benefits that encourage people either not to work, or to fo as little as possible. Don’t ask me which I am not going into specifics, you know how wide ranging the system is. Let’s put it this way, the whole benefits system in this country is geared in such a way that those who pay least into it get the most out of it.
 
My point is there are a shole range of benefits that encourage people either not to work, or to fo as little as possible. Don’t ask me which I am not going into specifics, you know how wide ranging the system is. Let’s put it this way, the whole benefits system in this country is geared in such a way that those who pay least into it get the most out of it.
I think you're referring to the tax system, whereby the very rich receive the greatest benefit by paying , proportionately, the least into it.
 
I think you're referring to the tax system, whereby the very rich receive the greatest benefit by paying , proportionately, the least into it.
No, I am referring to the whole system. The one I contributed to for, as I said 52 years, and no I am not and never have been very rich. But now I am retired, I receive my pension and free prescriptions and thats it. I know several people who have rarely, some never, worked in their lives yet they get a pension + top ups , free dental treatment including dentures if required, spectacles, when needed, help with rent, council tax, need I go on. All those extras mentioned I have to pay for because I was foolish enough to work for a living. And now you expect me to welcome with open arms anyone else from anywhere else and keep them as well, no thanks. I will add, when I say keep them as well that’s because I contribute to their upkeep as at 80 years of age I stll pay income tax on my meagre pension. Goodnight.
 
Back
Top