I don`t know how much he was entitled to make of it but I do know that as they both said on Quest it was a clear foul which is what has to be determined when deciding whether to give a penalty so we were undoubtedly very lucky there.
Who was calling for him to be brought off? Don't go into management!
The manager was praising Connolly post match!
️
I agree with you about Swansea being boring, Connolly isn't Kenny but he did OK. Marv did have a few wobbles but I thought James did well. And Hubby was my MOTM.
I thought James had a good game. Connolly was solid and Mrv had a great game . Agree about Husband M.o.M though .
"We set up right" is only your opinion, no more than that. A draw, however, was a decent result keeping us and Swansea safely in mid table.
Agree. The fact he might have been touched doesn't mean the player didn't dive in an exaggerated manner. And that is more than likely what the ref saw. It might have been a penalty by the letter of the law but ut was also a blatant dive. The two are not mutually exclusive.
Our best players were Ekpiteta, Husband, Sterling and Keshi. Connolly and Wintle did OK. James, not sure either way tbh. Gabriel was OK but him and Sterling seem to duplicate each other. Grimshaws distribution was generally quite poor. Both Bowler and Mitchell need to get their heads up.
Nope, modern players are pathetic and have jelly legs
Good post.
The way I've seen it on the highlights Husband put his foot through the lad's ankle. You can't just shake your head and carry on.
What a load of tripe. Watch it again after removing your Tangerine specs. Stop trying to defend the indefensible ( your previous post).
Does Keshi have some Jedi mind trick like abilities? starting to think so after another slow moving, time-bending finish - Love it PdxTangerine !!
Wasn't given - so that's the end of it.
It wasn't a penalty because the ref didn't give it. But if you care to read my post properly I said the guy dived. He did that to try and influence the ref into awarding a penalty. And your comparison with the QPR incident is a load of tripe as well. One was the ref deciding in HIS opinion whether to award a penalty and the other was a proven factual mistake by the ref.
Rubbish but as ever you have to argue however wrong you demonstrably are .You just can`t help yourself can you. You find it almost impossible to admit you`re wrong. We were debating on here whether it SHOULD have been given not whether it was given as we know that already. Is that too much for you to grasp?
are you deliberately being a dick. Of course you are. My primary point was about the theatrical dive to try and make sure the ref gave it. If you don't think he dived and that his actions were theatrical then you are more stupid than I already know you are. You could discuss every game every week and there will always be a claim for a penalty. It's also a fact that in probably every game there's a case for a penalty being given that isn't. You're really offering nothing new.
good reply, rather than address the points I make you offer nothing. Anyway it amuses me that I know best. Bit like you and your racing tips, and your golf posts. After the event of course. That's why I give you the "treatment" because I sussed you for what you are years ago. A bullshitter. You've been doing it for years. Amazing how easy I draw you in too. You can't help yourself. Have a nice day.
www.swanseacity.com