The Far Right

Yep but plays infinitely better than Ian Bell wouldn't you say.? There you go, the winning six over Long off. Reckon that's your position Robbie.

Bell had a range of shots that enable him to score all round the wicket. I'm not surprised you don't see him as a role model.
 
Have to say 20’s deserves all the credit for this oneπŸ‘Answers every question unlike the op.... mex and Elle have bowled pretty poorly today.... one or two others had a few overs to no avail ....20’s even went in for lunch... but they still couldn’t hit the wicket.... Wiz tried to see if he could find some spin... only achieved a no ball... time to declare 20’sπŸ‘πŸ‘....only joking ledsπŸ‘πŸ˜
 
Have to say 20’s deserves all the credit for this oneπŸ‘Answers every question unlike the op.... mex and Elle have bowled pretty poorly today.... one or two others had a few overs to no avail ....20’s even went in for lunch... but they still couldn’t hit the wicket.... Wiz tried to see if he could find some spin... only achieved a no ball... time to declare 20’sπŸ‘πŸ‘....only joking ledsπŸ‘πŸ˜
Cheers, agree it's a poor bowling attack but even poor bowling of minor counties standard needs to be dealt with patiently. Note quite a 20/20 match, bit more like a test match where you have to build an innings. Winning run already hit so walks off to applause. Opponents gave it their best shot but class tells.
 
…. Mex clearly had to be taken out of the attack after being clobbered to all parts of the ground. Left the field early feigning injury. Doubts about his fitnees or availability for the next match whenever that is. Sure it won't be too long away.
 
…. Mex clearly had to be taken out of the attack after being clobbered to all parts of the ground. Left the field early feigning injury. Doubts about his fitnees or availability for the next match whenever that is. Sure it won't be too long away.

Well done Cat πŸ‘

Although I suspect the poor old dog may be due another visit to the vetπŸΆπŸ™€
 
Well done Cat πŸ‘

Although I suspect the poor old dog may be due another visit to the vetπŸΆπŸ™€
Thanks for coming back on to the field of play to acknowledge your defeat. πŸ‘ Don't be a bad loser though. I'm sure you'll have better days when the opposition isn't quite so strong and so quick off the front foot.
 
Your side of the debate. You mean the anti racist side?
no, I mean the fact I said it had been a discussion on a tv programme which was probably brought about by the BLM movement or people associated with it. Nothing racist by stating that at all. Why anyway, are you of the opinion it should be removed?
 
Says King Twister!! Twistier than a cork screw.

The truth is you’ve been called out and caught out - once again!! And you hate it πŸ˜‚ πŸ˜‚ πŸ˜‚

I’m just waiting for Cat to tear you a new one - yet again. It’s always great entertainment watching her methodically take you apart. πŸ‘
Him. How many times? I don't bother to respond when it's the blustering idiots trying to sneak in a snarky insult but you Mex are a poster I respect and usually talks a great deal of sense.
 
no, I mean the fact I said it had been a discussion on a tv programme which was probably brought about by the BLM movement or people associated with it. Nothing racist by stating that at all. Why anyway, are you of the opinion it should be removed?
There was a post on Churchill a long time ago over on the other site. I can't remember the exact words then but I will give you the key points.
Churchill was a racist and starved over 2 million Bengalis to death.
Churchill was a vile politician who advocated shooting miners in Wales for going on strike.
Churchill made many mistakes, was often a poor tactician and was cavalier with the lives of working class soldiers in Gallipoli and other campaigns.when
Churchill was primarily motivated by threats to the Empire.
However
He was the leader in the Second World War at a time when our nation was under great threat. He did galvanize the country and persuaded the US to offer logistical support prior to their entry into the war. At this time in our history he was the leader we needed and so it is right that he has his status in such a prominent position.
I've even acknowledged that it is right for Thatcher to have a statue (as the first female PM.) though here we should wait until after the people she damaged so badly with her policies are out of the picture- maybe to mark a century since she came to power.
I digress though. Churchill should have a statue though we should not regard it as sacred or a little bit of graffiti as such a heinous crime.
 
There was a post on Churchill a long time ago over on the other site. I can't remember the exact words then but I will give you the key points.
Churchill was a racist and starved over 2 million Bengalis to death.
Churchill was a vile politician who advocated shooting miners in Wales for going on strike.
Churchill made many mistakes, was often a poor tactician and was cavalier with the lives of working class soldiers in Gallipoli and other campaigns.when
Churchill was primarily motivated by threats to the Empire.
However
He was the leader in the Second World War at a time when our nation was under great threat. He did galvanize the country and persuaded the US to offer logistical support prior to their entry into the war. At this time in our history he was the leader we needed and so it is right that he has his status in such a prominent position.
I've even acknowledged that it is right for Thatcher to have a statue (as the first female PM.) though here we should wait until after the people she damaged so badly with her policies are out of the picture- maybe to mark a century since she came to power.
I digress though. Churchill should have a statue though we should not regard it as sacred or a little bit of graffiti as such a heinous crime.
Exactly. A bit of graffiti isn't "destroying" anything.

Blowing to smithereens ancient religious symbols that don't conform to your belief system is.

That's why the BLM are not the Taliban.
 
Last edited:
Are you feeling unwell today Cat? Posting positives about someone you despise as well as negatives!
But it does distract from my primary point. And that was that there was a discussion on a tv programme about whether it should be removed. And for that to be even on the agenda is a total nonsense.
 
How old are both 20togo and Mexboroseasider?

They both sound like a pair of argumentative children.

All this, on an obscure Internet forum.

Two old men, allowing themselves to be wound up by one another.

What a childish embarrassment, the pair of you are😳
 
Are you feeling unwell today Cat? Posting positives about someone you despise as well as negatives!
But it does distract from my primary point. And that was that there was a discussion on a tv programme about whether it should be removed. And for that to be even on the agenda is a total nonsense.
Ask a question, get a full and qualified answer and then complain that it is a distraction.
 
How old are both 20togo and Mexboroseasider?

They both sound like a pair of argumentative children.

All this, on an obscure Internet forum.

Two old men, allowing themselves to be wound up by one another.

What a childish embarrassment, the pair of you are😳

Fair comment.

But what you have to understand about getting older is that......you don’t care that much πŸ‘πŸ™€πŸΆ
 
How old are both 20togo and Mexboroseasider?

They both sound like a pair of argumentative children.

All this, on an obscure Internet forum.

Two old men, allowing themselves to be wound up by one another.

What a childish embarrassment, the pair of you are😳
Man complains on an obscure internet forum about two other men debating on it 🀣
 
Fair comment.

But what you have to understand about getting older is that......you don’t care that much πŸ‘πŸ™€πŸΆ
Exactly. I certainly don't get wound up by it at all. And I doubt Mex does either. Just a bit of entertainment to help the day go quicker when the missus is at work. Roll on getting back to the football and the more important stuff.
 
Exactly. I certainly don't get wound up by it at all. And I doubt Mex does either. Just a bit of entertainment to help the day go quicker when the missus is at work. Roll on getting back to the football and the more important stuff.
He’s lying again. He seethes all the time.

Why do you suppose his dog spends so much time at the vets? Poor little sod is forever being launched across the room whenever The Master logs on.

Frankly I think an intervention is called for.
 
He’s lying again. He seethes all the time.

Why do you suppose his dog spends so much time at the vets? Poor little sod is forever being launched across the room whenever The Master logs on.

Frankly I think an intervention is called for.
Yep, the dog was due his quarterly dose of tablets. Anyway, get yourself off to the doctors. Bit of dementia setting in methinks if you can't remember what you posted. Now how many times was it you denied you'd posted on the Atlanta thread. And you accuse me of lying.
Anyway, no worries, I forgive you.
 
Man complains on an obscure internet forum about two other men debating on it 🀣

It’s not a complaint. Merely an observation.

Life is too short to be so angry.

Especially given none of you will change any of your political persuasions, or opinions.

In the bigger context of life, it’s all pretty sad and embarrassing that you spend so much time arguing on an obscure Internet forum.
 
as I was saying.....early signs...
Now I thought you had a point for a moment.

As I was sure I’d replied to a post from Calm Down that said β€œnot a complaint, just an observation”. But then it wasn’t there!! Crikey!! But then it was back again with extra text. Blimey!! The wonders of technology.

Anyway, relieved that I haven’t got early onset, I am conscious we’re being told off for being boring feckers (that includes you 20s). So I’ll bid you good night.
 
Yep, the dog was due his quarterly dose of tablets. Anyway, get yourself off to the doctors. Bit of dementia setting in methinks if you can't remember what you posted. Now how many times was it you denied you'd posted on the Atlanta thread. And you accuse me of lying.
Anyway, no worries, I forgive you.

I'd be careful about having a pop at other people for strange mental behaviour, if I were you.
 
Retrieved from the dock and put in a museum. Hardly destroyed. Get a grip you snowflake.

My Black Nationalist friends? What does that even mean?

Your original point was comparing the protesters to the Taliban. If you think they're the same you need help.
No it wasn't, it compared one particular action of destroying historical monuments to the Taliban.

Because it's what both groups do.

Learn to read, and stop defending your thuggish violent destructive friends.
 
Nope, just like you fcuked up on the Atlanta thread you've fcuked up here as well. My response about the nation needing to get a grip was a response to Wizzard that Donk needs to. I haven't suggested vast numbers of agitators and commies are calling for it's removal at all. You are making things up. I simply said it was a topic for discussion on a news programme yesterday which it was. And to me that that was even considered a topic for discussion was a total nonsense and why I said the nation needs to get a grip!

So just to put you right - it was NOT fake news. And I love how you put your caveats in! By saying no-one credible. I agree with that. So how the hell then was it a topic for discussion!
Sorry what do I need to get a grip about?

Are you upset about a revolutionary group which has an agenda to destroy by force historical monuments because they don't fit their version of history, being compared to the Taliban who have an agenda to destroy by force historical monuments because they don't fit their version of history? πŸ€”

Naah!

I agree the Nation needs to get a grip thoughπŸ‘πŸ»
 
Sorry what do I need to get a grip about?

Are you upset about a revolutionary group which has an agenda to destroy by force historical monuments because they don't fit their version of history, being compared to the Taliban who have an agenda to destroy by force historical monuments because they don't fit their version of history? πŸ€”

Naah!

I agree the Nation needs to get a grip thoughπŸ‘πŸ»
Why are you quoting me on this? I was quoting Wiz telling you that you need to get a grip. [which was a nonsense.]
 
Why are you quoting me on this? I was quoting Wiz telling you that you need to get a grip.
Sorry - You mentioned me in your post.

Wiz struggles with anybody critisisng any view the BBC and the MSM endorce πŸ˜‰

I had no idea of the context and I certainly wasn't going to read a whole thread full of insane ramblings by holier than thou nutters, preaching their gospel justifying this week's events 😁
 
Still in denial 20s?

I know you claimed it as a great victory but you can’t deny you, personally, added to one of the most impressive scores ever on the new avftt. By your nemesis. Cat. πŸ‘
 
Sorry what do I need to get a grip about?

Are you upset about a revolutionary group which has an agenda to destroy by force historical monuments because they don't fit their version of history, being compared to the Taliban who have an agenda to destroy by force historical monuments because they don't fit their version of history? πŸ€”

Naah!

I agree the Nation needs to get a grip thoughπŸ‘πŸ»
Donk,
I think you’ll find the reason is, the monuments actually DO fit their version of history. Which happens to be correct.
 
Still in denial 20s?

I know you claimed it as a great victory but you can’t deny you, personally, added to one of the most impressive scores ever on the new avftt. By your nemesis. Cat. πŸ‘
Not in denial about anything. If that floats Cats boat then good luck to him.
You still lied though. Was it three times you denied posting on a thread. You asked me to prove it and I duly did.
Simple facts, Mex. πŸ˜‚ πŸ˜‚ πŸ˜‚
 
Back
Top