As Lost points out, given the demographic makeup of Gaza men make up only about 25% of the population. Therefore if the killing was indiscriminate you could expect deaths of males to be at about 25%, which is why it is smaller than women or children. It is not necessarily evidence of terrorists using civilians a human shields, although it would be naive to assume that this does not happen at times.
Anyway, unlike you, I blame the actor who did the action of killing.;
Hamas rocket kills civilians, Hamas's fault. Israeli bullet / bomb killing civilian, Israel's fault.
But to you the equation is this; Hamas rocket, Hamas's fault. Israeli bullet / bomb killing civilian, Hamas's fault as well.
Your logic is all over the place.
But then you always fall back to 'well Hamas started it'.
That cannot be used as a justification to kill innocent people - unless you are amoral you must accept that the killing of innocents is wrong (like you did with the 2 women in the church). Logically, the two women in the church are no different to the innocent Muslim women and children dying in Gaza, the innocent people in kibbutzes and so on. They are all innocent and therefore there is no justification for killing them. And if you accept that killing innocents is wrong then logically you cannot support the indiscriminate killing of either Hamas or Israel.