Well, for why near the bench....look at my last post and the retracing the journey timeline on the sky site, it's such a short window. She went up past the bench and was seen at 9:10. Then, they believe her phone was on the bench at 9:20, so she must have gone back that way, it's the only real way to go.
By 9:30 the conference call ended but she remained dialled in.
Its hard to see how anything else could occur without attracting attention.
But the point is her phone was on that bench and less than 10 minutes later the call ended and she stayed logged in, so she must have gone in at or around that point, or the phone wouldnt be there. Just seems to me hard to slip down a big bank which is pretty long from the bench to the edge as seen. Phone on the bench listening to the call you'd think she'd be be close by. Quite a long way from that bench to the water.
View attachment 14406
Then at the river it doesn't look impossible to get out of or that deep. At some points is deeper but some is waist high, am yet to see it confirmed around the bench area near the rivers edge how deep it is with the water at this level, sites suggest it's low.
Obviously cold water shock and the clothes she wore could be why she didn't make it. But where is a single shred of evidence and where is the body. It's a slow moving river that seemingly hasn't had high water levels and according to that expert guy on sky news, if sonar is used it should be easy to spot.
Going in seems the most plausible, but how did it happen and why no evidence.