basilrobbie3
Well-known member
You're right, and he may have done. I doubt "control" ever really passed though. Do you agree?OO? or had he already signed everything over to Vicki first?
You're right, and he may have done. I doubt "control" ever really passed though. Do you agree?OO? or had he already signed everything over to Vicki first?
You're right, and he may have done. I doubt "control" ever really passed though. Do you agree?
Spot on. I had a week at the BES call centre on Faraday. I was going through the script each newbie had in front of them & when I said over the phone to a new business "I represent BES" I got a tap on the shoulder & informed not to mention BES but use a made up company name. Alarm bells rang plus being surrounded by coked up gobshites I thought get me out of here.I think it was an open secret for most of them. Equally as guilty as far as I can see, they were part of it.
Presumably you were able to get out That might not apply to everyone who works thereSpot on. I had a week at the BES call centre on Faraday. I was going through the script each newbie had in front of them & when I said over the phone to a new business "I represent BES" I got a tap on the shoulder & informed not to mention BES but use a made up company name. Alarm bells rang plus being surrounded by coked up gobshites I thought get me out of here.
I can’t understand why it takes so long, the judge has had several weeks to deliberate, surely it’s a simple case of “I’m sentencing you to 7/8/10 years” or whatever.Today and tomorrow morning.
My son's best friend used to work for BES around the time they got raided and he knew they where dodgy going on's as did many of his colleagues, so you can luck it from another perspective Pilley is the one who's taking the fall for all this and their lucky that being compliant they haven't had their collars felt.They are victims too but I don’t think it’s the people who worked for Pilley who are responsible
Especially the small businesses they bankrupted.lots of ordinary peoples livelihoods will be affected through no fault of their own
They were following scripts designed to take people into long term binding contracts that ultimately ruined their businesses.They are victims too but I don’t think it’s the people who worked for Pilley who are responsible
Yes but not everyone is in a position to walk out of a job. It’s easy to take the moral high ground in a hypothetical situationThey were following scripts designed to take people into long term binding contracts that ultimately ruined their businesses.
They knew what was going on.
So you can't complain if you lose your job because of illegal practices then.Yes but not everyone is in a position to walk out of a job. It’s easy to take the moral high ground in a hypothetical situation
Choice between job and feeding the family?So you can't complain if you lose your job because of illegal practices then.
Apparently there's a labour market shortage, meaning plenty of jobs out there, especially contact centre work, like these jobs.Choice between job and feeding the family?
Great but are the jobs based in Fleetwood? Minimum wage becomes a lot less if travel expenses and child care costs are factored in. My point is that it is easy to take the moral high ground but equally I’m sure we all know people who are in jobs that they hate but are trapped in them.Apparently there's a labour market shortage, meaning plenty of jobs out there, especially contact centre work, like these jobs.
I get what you're saying about the jobs market in Fleetwood and the reasons why you wouldn't want to travel far. However, working for the Oystons isn't comparable.Great but are the jobs based in Fleetwood? Minimum wage becomes a lot less if travel expenses and child care costs are factored in. My point is that it is easy to take the moral high ground but equally I’m sure we all know people who are in jobs that they hate but are trapped in them.
There were people working for BFC who didn’t agree with the Oystons. Are you saying that they should have refused to work for them?
I will say again that I have sympathy for the people who will lose their jobs as a result of this.
Jesus is that for real ????Judge urged to be lenient because he's helping illiterate inmates with letters to loved ones.
Desperate defence if that's all he's got.
It's in the article.Jesus is that for real ????
Give the guy a break. Perhaps those loved ones are struggling to find an energy supplier and Pilley has offered to help.Judge urged to be lenient because he's helping illiterate inmates with letters to loved ones.
Desperate defence if that's all he's got.
They could work for Fisherman's Friend or pack ice.I get what you're saying about the jobs market in Fleetwood and the reasons why you wouldn't want to travel far. However, working for the Oystons isn't comparable.
Like it or not, BFC was not run in an illegal manner.
If I was asked to, in effect, fleece pensioners and small businesses I'd look elsewhere.
That's how loan sharks work, find people struggling to get credit then fleece them, there is nothing in that article that mentions him showing any sympathy for anyone but himselfGive the guy a break. Perhaps those loved ones are struggling to find an energy supplier and Pilley has offered to help.
Keep him in for longer then, or they’ll be knackered when he gets out.Judge urged to be lenient because he's helping illiterate inmates with letters to loved ones.
Desperate defence if that's all he's got.
That’s the best one liner defence since Oystons Lawyer quoted “ He loves Blackpool FC “Judge urged to be lenient because he's helping illiterate inmates with letters to loved ones.
Desperate defence if that's all he's got.
Top postingGive the guy a break. Perhaps those loved ones are struggling to find an energy supplier and Pilley has offered to help.
Doesn't wash I'm afraid.Choice between job and feeding the family?
He was not that committed to the area when he laid off 30% of his call centre staff and moved the centre to South Africa, ???? , he is a convicted conman, always was and always will beMr Laidlow said Pilley had "built a business which provided huge employment and economical benefits to the people of the area." He had "remained true to his roots by being committed to the area in which he grew up."
Blimey, what a guy.
Thank fuck he couldn't afford BFC at the time.
By involving hundreds of locals in his great fraud what a guy.Mr Laidlow said Pilley had "built a business which provided huge employment and economical benefits to the people of the area." He had "remained true to his roots by being committed to the area in which he grew up."
Blimey, what a guy.
Thank fuck he couldn't afford BFC at the time.
The judge will have to go through a very prescriptive set of calculations, explain exactly how he has got to the final sentence, which category he found the cases to be, highlight any aggravating and mitigating factors, explain why certain sentences are concurrent or consecutive et ceteraI can’t understand why it takes so long, the judge has had several weeks to deliberate, surely it’s a simple case of “I’m sentencing you to 7/8/10 years” or whatever.
The sentences should be consecutive not concurrent imoI’m starting to think my 8years prediction could be on the low side
Not necessarily but my point is that the Judge has to go through the correct processes and get it right. He can’t just wander in to court say 8 years and leaveThe sentences should be consecutive not concurrent imo
But if say he got 4 years for each offence as an example = 16 years and they run concurrent he’d only serve 4years( two thirds probably) as they’d all be served at the same time. If consecutive they’d run one after the otherNot necessarily but my point is that the Judge has to go through the correct processes and get it right. He can’t just wander in to court say 8 years and leave
Any mistakes will be exposed on Appeal
That would be consecutiveBut if say he got 4 years for each offence as an example = 16 years and they run concurrent he’d only serve 4years( two thirds probably) as they’d all be served at the same time. If concurrent they’d run one after the other
Concurrent sentences are appropriate where offences arise out of the same incident or set of facts.That would be consecutive
It was supposed to reconvene at 2.15.Well here we are, Tuesday afternoon, sentencing was supposed to be a day and a half starting yesterday. What’s happened?
That would be
Don’t courts finish at 4pm ?It was supposed to reconvene at 2.15.